Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements

ABSTRACT

One or more flow control modules, implemented on various types of network topologies, provide a number of functionalities for controlling the flow of IP packets (such as TCP/IP packets) over a network connection. The flow control modules may be implemented within a sender and/or receiver or may be deployed into a network as a separate device without requiring significant additional resources.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S.application Ser. No. 12/567,402, filed Sep. 25, 2009, which is acontinuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/902,493, filed Jul. 28,2004, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 60/490,694, filed Jul. 29, 2003, and which also is acontinuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/696,507, filed Oct.29, 2003, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. ProvisionalApplication No. 60/422,801, filed Oct. 30, 2002, all of which areincorporated by reference in their entirety.

This application is related to the following, each of which isincorporated by reference in its entirety: co-pending U.S. applicationSer. No. 10/901,952 entitled “Flow Control System Architecture,”Attorney Docket No. 2006579-0752, filed Jul. 28, 2004; co-pending U.S.application Ser. No. 10/901,691 entitled “Automatic Detection and WindowVirtualization for Flow Control,” Attorney Docket No. 2006579-0754,filed Jul. 28, 2004; co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/902,509entitled “Early Generation of Acknowledgements for Flow Control,”Attorney Docket No. 2006579-0755, filed Jul. 28, 2004; co-pending U.S.application Ser. No. 10/902,491 entitled “TCP Selection Acknowledgementsfor Communicating Delivered and Missing Data Packets,” Attorney DocketNo. 2006579-0753, filed Jul. 28, 2004; and co-pending U.S. applicationSer. No. 10/901,940 entitled “Transaction Boundary Detection forReduction in Timeout Penalties,” Attorney Docket No. 2006579-0751, filedJul. 28, 2004.

BACKGROUND

1. Field of the Invention

This invention pertains to the processing of computer networks,networking equipment, and networking protocols, and in particular tosystems that enhance the performance of existing networking applicationsthrough the deployment of additional networking entities.

2. Background of the Invention

Many computer networking technologies and protocols are well known. Oneof the most widely used protocols is the Internet protocol (IP). IP is aconnectionless, best-effort, unreliable, routable networking protocol.Applications that require reliable communications typically use theTransmission Control Protocol (TCP) on top of IP. The TCP protocol layerprovides required functionality such as flow control, packet lossdetection, lost packet retransmission, congestion avoidance, etc.(hereinafter referred to as upper-layer behaviors) that are needed toprovide reliable communications over the unreliable IP networkingsubstrate. This pair of networking protocols is common enough that theyare often referred to jointly as TCP/IP. Detailed descriptions of TCPand IP are found in RFC 792 and RFC 793.

Research has developed a simple model that predicts the maximumperformance of TCP implementations that use the standard congestionavoidance algorithm (TCP Reno and TCP Tahoe). One good explanation ofthis model and its derivation is in a paper by Matthew Mathis, JeffreySemke, and Jamashid Mandavi, entitled “The Macroscopic Behavior of TCPCongestion Avoidance Algorithm.” Equation 3 of the paper provides asimple model of TCP performance:

BW=(MSS*C)/(RTT*SQRT(P))

-   -   where:    -   BW=Bandwidth for the TCP Connection    -   MSS=Maximum Segment Size, i.e., the size of the packets being        transported    -   RTT=Round Trip Time    -   P=Percentage of packet loss in the network    -   C=A constant.

One of the surprising results of this model is that maximum TCPperformance is unrelated to network speed. Another surprising result isthat maximum performance is inversely related to round trip time (RTT).

Other phenomena may limit performance below what the model provides as amaximum. For example, if the receiver does not advertise a window thatis at least as large as the bandwidth delay product of the connection,then maximum TCP performance will be limited accordingly. Standardimplementations of TCP are also known to perform poorly in certainenvironments and/or conditions. For example, the high rate of packetloss in typical wireless links results in poor TCP performance.

One method of correcting many of these problems is to modify the TCPimplementation of one or both of the participants. However, this isfrequently not a viable option such as when the source code isunavailable or when there are too many endpoints. to manageconveniently.

Another method is to interpose another element in the TCP conversation.This element, called a Performance Enhancing Proxy (PEP), appliesalgorithms to manipulate the conversation so as to overcome theperformance limitations. There are types of conventional PEPs and PEPalgorithms are known, as described for example in RFC 3135.

Deployment of conventional PEPs in a network is known by providing a newnetwork processing node and routing packets through it. This techniquesuffers from at least two disadvantages: first, the extra expense of theadditional processing node and its associated administrative overhead;and second, the conventional PEP often requires redundant processing dueto the poor integration with the other nodes of the network.

Another method of deploying a conventional PEP is to insert it into thesoftware driver stack of a node. Many operating systems provide theability to insert a software agent (shim) between the TCP/IP processingstack and the driver for the network interface card (NIC). One advantageof this method is that no changes to the operating system are required,which, in any event, may be impossible since access to the source codeis frequently limited. Even with access to the source code of anoperating system, the operational issues associated with supplying andsupporting customized versions of the operating system make thisprohibitive in many environments.

Conventional PEPs have a number of shortcomings, including the need forsubstantial network changes, utility and application changes,administrative overhead, and extensive use of system and networkresources. It would be desirable for the addition of PEPs (either inshim or stand-alone form) be done in such a way as to minimize changesrequired to other nodes of the network. In particular, no changes shouldbe required to existing utilities and application programs. No changesto firewall settings, routing tables, or port assignments should berequired. No retraining of users or network operations staff should berequired. No reinstallation of applications or utilities should berequired. New software that is being developed should be able to takeadvantage of PEP capabilities without any change to the developmentprocess or to the software itself.

Ideally, existing network equipment and software, both on the Local AreaNetwork (LAN) and the Wide Area Network (WAN), should require minimal,if any, modification. It would also be desirable for the PEP itselfshould not require substantial system resources, such as random accessmemory or disk storage. Requiring large amounts of these resources notonly increases system expense, but also requires additional environmentattention (more power, more space, etc.) and also reduces overall systemreliability.

Likewise, it would be desirable for communications protocols used by thePEP to adhere to the standard TCP protocols as they currently appear onthe network, minimizing any disruption to existing network software orequipment and ensuring compatibility with new equipment that iscurrently in development now or in the future by inventors not aware ofthe present invention. Some prior art techniques translate the TCP/IPprotocol into other protocols (e.g., User Datagram Protocol (UDP)),causing disruption to network monitoring, traffic shaping, Quality ofService (QoS), Service Level Agreement (SLA), statistics measuringapplications, and others; they also require modifications to firewalland security settings due to the usage of protocols that were notpreviously employed. Worse, applications environments and settings willrequire modification to direct traffic flows to explicitly designatedtranscoding network nodes.

Security techniques that are currently deployed should be preservedwherever possible. It would be desirable for the PEP to be fullyfunctional in the presence of modem encryption and authenticationtechniques.

Moreover, the PEP should operate incrementally, with a minimal increasein the latency of data transmission. It should not require access tomultiple blocks of data before data transmission can begin. It wouldalso be desirable to minimize a latency of data transiting a PEP.

Similarly, it would be desirable to have algorithms employed by a PEPnot be subject to any arbitrary limits. They should scale to anyarbitrary speed and handle any type of connection media, includinghigh-delay satellite links, high loss-rate wireless and power-linenetworking links, and others. The algorithms should function properly inthe presence of standard traffic management techniques. Plus, it shouldsmoothly operate with any existing Quality of Service (QoS) or servicelevel agreement (SLA) architecture that might be deployed, allowingthese systems to limit the performance of the original endpoint, just asthough the PEP were not present.

TCP connection characteristics can be measured along multipledimensions. A partial list of the dimensions includes: RTT, connectionbandwidth, aggregate loss rate, connection lifetime, applicationburstiness, and others. Across all of these dimensions, no algorithm canbe optimal. A PEP should monitor the connection, characterizing it asconditions change, adapting the PEP algorithms accordingly.

One example of prior art is the Transporter Fountain from DigitalFountain Corporation of Fremont, Calif. The product is intended totransfer files across large RTT links without the performance limitsthat standard File Transfer Protocol-based (FTP) techniques suffer from.(FTP uses TCP/IP that has the performance limit described above.) Thisproduct consists of a “box” that the user connects to his network. Theuser must explicitly copy the files to be transferred to the box beforethe files can be transferred. Thus, all applications programs andscripts that wish to utilize the product must be changed to utilize thenew box with its proprietary command set. Further, the transferprotocols used by the product are UDP based, requiring the modificationof network settings, such as security, QoS, SLA, traffic management, andothers. The transcoding from FTP to UDP interferes with any networkelement that might attempt to process the individual TCP connection,such as QoS, SLA or traffic management.

Another example of prior art is the Sequence Reducer from PeribitCorporation of Santa Clara, Calif. This product provides datacompression using advanced data sequence recognition techniquesdeveloped for the Human Genome project. However, general-purposelossless data compression is typically limited to a two- to three-timesreduction in data, placing an upper limit on the total performanceimprovement that can be provided by this technique. Further, many datatypes are already compressed, wasting system resources attempting any Me r compression for these data types. The computational expense of thismethod requires the addition of an extra box to the network and limitsthe speed at which packets can be processed. Current CPU technologyseems to limit processing speeds to about 45 Mb/sec (T3) for any oneconnection. Current data link speeds are well in excess of this limitand growing at a faster rate than CPU performance is growing. Theproduct does not address the fundamental limits of the TCP/IP protocoland is thereby permanently limited to a maximum of two- to three-timesperformance improvement over offerings without the PEP.

Research into methods of improving the performance limit of TCP ison-going. One proposal, MulTCP, is documented in the paper“Differentiated End-to-End Internet Services using a WeightedProportional Fair Sharing TCP” by John Crowcroft and Philippe Oechslin.

Consequently, a new system and/or method of creating and deploying ofPEPs is required to efficiently integrate them into a network. ThesePEPs would preferably supply algorithms that remove the performancelimitations inherent in TCP implementations.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The detection and retransmission of lost packets are important toreliable communications over a network. Accordingly, the inventionprovides methods, systems, and computer program products for determiningwhich data packets have been received based on acknowledgements receivedfor those data packets. To resolve the ambiguity that may exist when anacknowledgement arrives for a particular data packet that has been sentmore than once, the invention enables the disambiguation of suchacknowledgements. Knowing for which instance of a data packet'stransmission an acknowledgement was received allows the sender tounderstand where the receiver was in the “wavefront” of packetstransmitted by the sender when the acknowledgement was generated. This,in turn, allows the sender to know which particular instances of datapackets' transmissions have been received, allowing the sender to makebetter decisions about the need to retransmit lost data packets.

The sender, or a proxy module coupled to or part of the sender,disambiguates received ambiguous acknowledgements according to any of anumber of techniques. In one embodiment, the sender transmits aplurality of data packets to the receiver over a network. The senderalso retransmits data packets as needed, responsive for example to anindication that the receiver did not receive particular data packets.Meanwhile, the sender also receives acknowledgements from the receiverindicating that at least some of the data packets have been received. Todetermine the particular instance of transmitted or retransmitted datapacket to which an ambiguous acknowledgement relates, the senderdisambiguates the received acknowledgements. By disambiguating anacknowledgement, the sender associates that acknowledgement with theparticular instance of a data packet's transmission or retransmissionthat the acknowledgement was meant to indicate has arrived at thereceiver. This disambiguation of received ambiguous acknowledgements isachieved according to any of a number of techniques.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts a Virtual Private Network gateway.

FIG. 2 depicts the Virtual Private Network of FIG. 1 augmented with asingle PEP.

FIG. 3 depicts the Virtual Private Network of FIG. 1 augmented with twoPEPS.

FIG. 4 shows the architecture of a PEP.

FIG. 5 a shows the architecture of a TCP endpoint.

FIG. 5 b shows the architecture of a TCP endpoint augmented with a PEP.

FIG. 6 shows the architecture of a system using a PEP with only onephysical connection to the network.

FIG. 7 a shows the architecture of a gateway.

FIG. 7 b shows the architecture of a gateway augmented with a PEP.

FIG. 8 a depicts a common network configuration utilizing one wirelesslink.

FIG. 8 b shows the system of FIG. 8 a augmented with a PEP.

FIG. 9 depicts another embodiment of a system augmented with a PEP.

FIG. 10 shows the architecture of a system with two PEPs and a networkaddress translation (NAT) device.

FIG. 11 shows the system of FIG. 3 augmented with a connection orientednetwork.

FIG. 12 depicts the architecture of a system with two PEPs using theproxy deployment mode.

FIG. 13 depicts the architecture of a system with two PEPs using theproxy deployment mode in which the downstream PEP is dual-homed.

FIG. 14 depicts the architecture of the hybrid half-proxy deploymentmode.

FIG. 15 depicts the architecture of the dual PEP HTTP system.

FIG. 16 illustrates one embodiment of a flow control system, whichincludes three flow control modules, for use in transporting databetween a sender.

FIG. 17 is a trace diagram for one embodiment of a method for generatingearly acknowledgements for flow control.

FIG. 18 is a schematic diagram of one embodiment of a flow controlmodule, or PEP, for generating early acknowledgements for flow control.

FIG. 19 illustrates one embodiment of a flow control system including afirst flow control module and a second flow control module for use intransporting data from a first node to a second node.

FIG. 20 illustrates one embodiment of a data packet for use in a flowcontrol system.

FIG. 21 illustrates one embodiment of session initialization in a flowcontrol system.

FIG. 22 illustrates one embodiment of scaling in a flow control system.

FIG. 23 illustrates one embodiment of buffer virtualization in a flowcontrol system.

FIG. 24 illustrates an example of a series of data packets transmittedfrom a sender to a receiver over a network.

FIG. 25 is a flow chart of a method for wavefront detection anddisambiguation of acknowledgments.

FIG. 26 illustrates one embodiment of a system for transmitting andacknowledging data packets.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention addresses the deficiencies of conventional PEPS.Several advances in the state of the art are provided, eliminatingnumerous barriers to deployment present in the prior art solutions. Thepresent invention can be deployed into a network without requiringsignificant additional resources. The present invention is notfundamentally limited in its performance boost by RTT. Minimaladditional latency is introduced by its presence in the network,allowing the PEP benefits to be extended to connections with small RTTs.Distributed implementations of the present invention support redundantlyconnected networks in order to provide superior reliability and scalableperformance.

No changes in the network topology are required to obtain the benefitsof the invention. No changes in application or utility programs oroperational procedures are required. The invention interoperatesseamlessly with the existing security, performance, QoS, SLA, traffic,and network management infrastructure. Usage of existing standardprotocols and packet formats allows the invention to be deployed withoutmodification to any part of the network and ensures compatibility withcurrent and future developments in network processing devices.

Though the practitioner understands that the TCP protocol isbidirectional (i.e., every sender is also a receiver), and that everypacket may contain information for both directions, this specificationwill normally describe only one direction of the TCP conversation. Itshould be understood that the techniques and methods described hereinmay be applied to one or both directions of a TCP connection, seriallyand/or simultaneously. In places where the bidirectional nature requiresspecial handling, this specification will address specifically thoseissues when encountered. In addition, embodiments of the systems andprocesses described herein are configured for use with transmissioncontrol protocol (“TCP”) data packets, alternative embodiments of thesystem and process are configured for use with other Internet-protocol(“IP”) based packets, e.g., IP security (“IPSec”), IP version 4(“IPV4”), IP version 6 (“IPV6”), or user datagram protocol (“UDP”) datapackets.

Packet-switched networks are constructed of interior and endpointelements. An endpoint element (or end node) is either a sender (orsource or initiation) or receiver (or destination or responder) of data,i.e., a place where data enters or exits the network. Typically, anendpoint consists of a network interface card (NIC) for performingphysical data reception and transmission and software running on amicroprocessor (CPU) that processes the data packets. A new trend inendpoints is to recast portions of the processing software intohardware, improving system performance by reducing CPU processing.Endpoints can be dedicated processing devices as well as general-purposecomputers. Many types of dedicated processing devices are. known to haveIP endpoints including: storage arrays, storage array controllers,storage switches, Fibre Channel bridges, remote tape libraries, diskarrays, file servers, mail servers, personal digital assistants (PDA),handheld computers, cellular phones, embedded computer systems, personalvideo recorders, media appliances, and others.

Many types of interior elements are known including: hubs, bridges,switches, routers, bridging routers, modems, gateways, and others. Theinterior elements may be divided into two categories: modifying andnon-modifying. A non-modifying interior element .passes packets throughit without modifying the packet data. Typical non-modifying interiorelements include: hubs, bridges, switches, and others. Note that manyinterior elements also contain endpoints for maintenance, control,monitoring, and other reasons. Modifying interior elements perform somealteration of packets as they transit. Examples of modifying interiorelements include: routers, gateways, modems, base stations, and others.

PEP Costs and Algorithms Classes

The interior elements of networks can be connected in manyconfigurations. Often, redundant transmission paths are created toimprove bandwidth and/or reliability. As described in RFC 3135, adding aconventional PEP to a network requires consideration of the networktopology. A conventional PEP algorithm can be classified with respect tonetwork topology. One class of conventional PEP algorithms requires thatall packets associated with a single TCP connection pass through thesame PEP instance (full-duplex). Another class of TCP PEP algorithmsrequires that only the data for one direction of a TCP connection passthrough the same PEP instance (half-duplex). Yet another class of TCPPEP algorithms has no restriction of this type (unrestricted).Deployment of full and half-duplex PEP algorithms may be restricteddepending on the implementation of a PEP “instance.”

Invariably, there is a cost to adding a conventional PEP to a network.The cost manifests itself both through increased computationrequirements (i.e., associated with actually performing the conventionalPEP algorithm itself) and increased latency. Indirect effects of theincreased latency (hence increased RTT) caused by the transit of apacket through the conventional PEP implementation includes reduced TCPthroughput and increased packet memory requirements. These increasedcosts may result in a situation where the benefits of the algorithmsprovided by the conventional PEP are insufficient to overcome theadditional costs either in computation, latency, or both, resulting inan overall degradation of the system. An intelligent PEP in accordancewith the present invention (an “enhanced PEP”) will detect thissituation and disable the algorithms that cause the degradation. In apreferred embodiment, an enhanced PEP algorithm that compensates forlong RTT connections is disabled when the RTT of an individualconnection is sufficiently low.

As another example, an enhanced PEP algorithm for repacketization mightbe disabled when the connection is to a well-known port for anapplication program known to provide maximum-sized packets. In the casewhere the PEP does not initially know that repacketization can bedisabled, the enhanced PEP enables repacketization and observes thetransiting traffic. Observation may indicate that repacketization isunnecessary, at which time the enhanced PEP disables the algorithm,thereby reducing processing time and decreasing latency. This decisionneed not be irrevocable. Observation of a connection with disabledrepacketization may conclude that it is profitable to re-enablerepacketization. Observation need not be continuous; intermittentobservation will function equally well for many applications and furtherreduces processing requirements.

Also, implementation techniques that minimize latency through theenhanced PEP are beneficial. The enhanced PEP contains a list of TCPconnections that are known to have no PEP algorithms enabled. Uponreceiving an incoming packet, the enhanced PEP consults the list. If thepacket belongs to a connection in the list, then the enhanced PEPimmediately forwards the packet without applying any PEP algorithms.This “fast path” through the enhanced PEP reduces latency.

A second list contains rules for determining which PEP algorithms shouldbe attempted for new connections. When the enhanced PEP receives aconnection-initiating packet for TCP, it consults the rules list todetermine if PEP algorithms should be attempted or if the fast pathshould be applied. The second section contains rules based on IPaddresses and TCP port numbers.

Some enhanced PEP algorithms can be enabled or disabled on apacket-by-packet basis. These algorithms can monitor the conversationand adjust themselves accordingly. Other enhanced PEP algorithms onlycan be enabled or disabled when the TCP conversation is initiated. Thesealgorithms monitor the connection open sequence (SYN packets) to maketheir choice. Other algorithms only can be enabled at open time, but canbe abandoned at any point afterwards.

As described above, certain enhanced PEP algorithms require all of theconnection data (either full- or half-duplex, hereinafter x-duplex) toflow through them. Deployment of these algorithms is conditional uponknowing that the x-duplex condition exists. Since network topologies canvary over time and since there is no topology change notificationmechanism in an IP network, a PEP should be able to detect the creationand the destruction of the x-duplex condition. Detection of the negativex-duplex condition allows the enhanced PEP to disable the algorithmsthat would malfunction. It is acceptable for the detection algorithm togenerate false negatives (i.e., where the detection algorithmincorrectly asserts a negative x-duplex condition) as the systemcontinues to operate correctly, although the performance benefits of thedisabled PEP algorithm are not obtained. In general, it may not bepossible for the PEP directly to detect the existence of the x-duplexcondition; however, it can detect it indirectly simply by assuming itsexistence and then detecting a negative x-duplex condition. One simpletechnique for detecting a negative x-duplex condition is to monitor thepacket stream and look for acknowledgements to packets that have notbeen seen, this is an indication that packets are being sent through adifferent path. This technique is very accurate, generating falsenegatives only in the presence of a malicious third party (i.e., a nodeinjecting packets into another endpoint's connection). Another method ofdetecting the negative x-duplex condition is to monitor timeouts. Toomany timeouts in a time horizon are a strong indication of the negativex-duplex condition.

The x-duplex condition is a characteristic of network topology, not ofan individual connection. Thus, when an enhanced PEP makes an assertionof the x-duplex condition, it applies not only to that connection, butto all other connections that are part of the same flow (see below forthe definition of flow).

Packet Flow

A flow is the collection of packets and connections that passes throughthe same two nodes on the network. There may be variations in therouting before, between, and after the two nodes. Packets belonging to aflow share the same path maximum transmission unit (PMTU) and share thebandwidth of the network connections between the two nodes. Many PEP,algorithms may be applied to all connections within a flow. For example,recongestion and repacketization operations are applied to all packetswithin a flow, optimizing the usage of system resources.

Flow Control System Overview

In conventional IP environments, e.g., transmission control protocol(TCP) environments, a sending node uses a slow start and congestionavoidance algorithms to determine data transmission rate. Because thedata transmission rate determination is made in a distributed fashionbased on packet loss feedback, response time is poor and utilization isoften low in high latency circumstances.

To address the shortcomings of conventional data communicationenvironments such as TCP, one embodiment the present invention includesone or more flow control modules at bottleneck points in the network.FIG. 16 illustrates one embodiment of a flow control system, whichincludes three flow control modules, for use in transporting databetween’ a sender and a receiver in accordance with the presentinvention.

FIG. 16 illustrates one embodiment of a flow control system 20 includinga first flow control module 1620 and a second flow control module 1630for use in transporting data from a first node, e.g., computer 1600, toa second node, e.g., computer 1640. In addition, the flow control systemmay have coupled with a third node, e.g., computer 175, whichcommunicatively couples the wide area network 120.

The flow control system 20 includes a one or more first (or sender,sending, source, or initiating) nodes, e.g., computers 1600 to 1603, oneor more second nodes (receiver, receiving, destination, or responding)nodes, e.g., computers 1640 to 1643, one or more third nodes (receiver,receiving, destination, or responding) nodes, e.g., computers 1670 to1673, one or more fourth nodes (receiver, receiving, destination, orresponding) nodes, e.g., computers 1680 to 1683, a first flow controlmodule 1620, a second flow control module 1630, a third flow controlmodule 1625, and a wide area network (e.g., the Internet) 1615.

Each one or more nodes may be networked, e.g., on a local area network(LAN), which are often high-speed networks and have shorter distancesand/or latencies than wider area networks. The one or more nodes couplewith a nearest flow control module in provided illustration, althoughthe fourth set of one or more nodes A80 does not have an associated flowcontrol module and is considered to be external to the flow controlsystem, although interoperable with it. Each flow control module 1620,1625, and 1630 communicatively couples with the wide area network (WAN)1615, which is often a low speed network and may have longer distancesand/or latencies that LANs. In one embodiment, the flow control modules1620, 1625, 1630 are inserted between the appropriate LAN and the WAN1615. In addition, the LANs or WAN may be wired or wireless.

It is noted that the flow control modules 1620, 1625, 1630 may also bereferred to as enhanced performance enhanced proxies (enhanced PEP). Inaddition, the flow control modules 1620, 1625, 1630 may be configured inhardware, software (including firmware), or a combination thereof. Forexample, the flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630 may be a physicaldevice configured to execute software embodying processes describedherein through a processing mechanism (e.g., processor, controller, orstate machine) or it may be a software component embodying processesdescribed herein residing within a network point, e.g., a switch orrouter, to operate within and/or in conjunction with that network point.

In communications initiated at the first node (e.g., 1600), how thatcommunication traverses the flow control system 20 depends upon whetherthe communication is destined for the second or third nodes (e.g., 1640,1670) or a fourth node A80 that is outside the flow control system 20.Each flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630 regulates data transfer rates,and can do so effectively because it is connected at a bandwidthbottleneck in the overall network. In addition, flow control modules1620, 1625, 1630 also may be placed at points on the network of latencytransitions (low latency to high latency) and on links with media losses(such as wireless or satellite links).

In one embodiment, each flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630 isconfigured to allow bandwidth at the bottleneck to be fully utilized,yet not overutilized. The flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630transparently buffers (or rebuffers data already buffered by, forexample, the sender) network sessions that pass between nodes havingassociated flow control modules. When a session passes through two ormore flow control modules, one or more of the flow control modulescontrols a rate of the session(s).

In one embodiment, the flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630 is eitherconfigured with predetermined data relating to bottleneck bandwidth.Alternatively, the flow control module 1620, 1625, 1630 may beconfigured to detect the bottleneck bandwidth. Unlike conventionalnetwork protocols such as TCP, the receiver-side flow control modulee.g., 1630, controls the data transmission rate. The receiver-side flowcontrol module controls 1630 the sender-side flow control module, e.g.,1620, data transmission rate by forwarding transmission rate limits tothe sender-side flow control module 1620. In one embodiment, thereceiver-side flow control module 1630 piggybacks these transmissionrate limits on acknowledgement (ACK) packets (or signals) sent to thesender 1600 by the receiver 1640. The receiver-side flow control module1630 does this in response to rate control requests that are sent by thesender side flow control module 1620. The requests from the sender-sideflow control module 1620 may be piggybacked on data packets sent by thesender 1600.

As an example, in FIG. 16, a sender node at site B establishes aconnection to transfer data to a receiver node at site A. The flowcontrol module 1620 at site B includes a send rate request for bandwidthO with the session establishment packet for the session. Assuming thereis no other traffic flowing to site A, the flow control module 1630 atsite A notifies the flow control module 1620 at site B to use a datatransmission rate of, e.g., min(N, O), and data transfer commences atthat rate. In situations where multiple data communication sessions,e.g., TCP sessions, are established between the same pair of flowcontrol nodes, e.g., 1620 and 1630, the bandwidth would have to beallocated among the sessions. This could be done fairly, with equalbandwidth given to each active session, or it could be done according toa predetermined policy configured for use with the appropriate flowcontrol modules.

Referring now to multi-session communication involving two or morenodes, for example, in system configurations where N<O and N<M, and anode at site C now also seeks to establish a connection to a node atsite A also with node B. In this scenario, the third flow control module1625 at C sends a rate request for bandwidth M. The second flow controlmodule 1630 at site A now must reallocate the bandwidth between the twoflow control nodes 1620, 1630 requesting bandwidth. In one embodiment,there may be an allocation of half bandwidth to each site. In this case,the flow control module at A sends a rate limit of N/2 to the third flowcontrol module 1625 and a rate limit of N/2 to the first flow controlmodule 1620. Thereafter, data transfer continues at these rates.

In some scenarios, different latencies between the sites can create datatransmission issues. For example, if the round trip time (RTT) for datatransmission between sites A and B is 100 milliseconds (ms), and the RTTbetween sites A and C is only 10 ms, if the second flow control module1630 at site A sends the rate limits simultaneously, the first flowcontrol module 1620 at site B will reduce its transmission rate 90 msafter the third flow control module 1625 at site C starts sending.Hence, for 90 ms the bottleneck at A may be overbooked.

To address overbooking, in one embodiment, the flow control modules maybe configured to delay rate control changes according to the knownlatencies. For example, in TCP, TCP protocol receivers have no knowledgeof RTT, but TCP senders can calculate an estimate for RTT. If thesending-side flow control module, e.g., 1620, 1625, forwards its RTTestimate to the receiving-side flow control module, e.g., 1630, thereceiving-side flow control module 1630 uses this information todetermine when to send rate control information. In such embodiments,there is a significant reduction of packet loss.

In an alternative embodiment, a sending-side first flow control module,e.g., 1620, module notifies the receiving-side second module, e.g.,1630, of its current sent rate. In this embodiment, the receiver-sidesecond flow control module 1630 at A waits until it receivesconfirmation from the sender-side first flow control module 1620 at Bthat it is reducing its sending rate before notifying the sending-sidethird flow control module 1625 at C to increase its sending rate. Hence,this approach minimizes or eliminates overbooking while still reducingor eliminating packet loss. In addition to the examples provided, thoseskilled in the art will recognize other alternative embodiments may beconfigured to vary rate control changes more slowly or more quicklydepending on the send rate history of a given flow control node.

In one embodiment the system and process describe herein may beconfigured as modular component having appropriate functionality for theprocess or flow described. In alternative embodiments, the processes orflows may be configured as software executable by a processor. In yetother embodiment, the process or flows may be configured as acombination of modules and or processor executable software.

Distributed PEPs

Using well-known techniques of distributed computing (e.g., sharedmemory, clustering, replication, etc.), a single enhanced PEP instancecan consist of multiple PEP members that communicate among themselves.These members share data so that they can jointly and individuallyperform PEP processing while simultaneously maintaining the coherence ofa single PEP instance. In this section, the enhanced PEP (or flowcontrol module) will simply be referred to as a PEP for ease ofdiscussion.

The benefits of distributed PEP processing are scaling in performance,capacity and reliability. Performance scaling comes from improving theprocessing of a single TCP connection. Capacity scaling comes fromincreasing the total number ‘of connections that can be handled.Reliability scaling comes from having multiple cooperatingimplementations that can survive the failure of one or more members.Distributed PEPs, that have members along all network paths for which aTCP connection may traverse, are able to implement those PEP algorithmsthat require access to all of the packets for a TCP connection (eitherhalf- or full-duplex), whereas multiple instances of nondistributed PEPsin a similar configuration would not be able to implement these same PEPalgorithms. A distributed PEP can be deployed in environments thatinclude link aggregation, multi-homing, link failover, and multiplyinterconnected networks.

As is typical of distributed computing, portions of some PEP algorithmsrequire global consistency. These portions necessitate that a singlepacket not completely traverse one cooperating PEP member until all ofthe members have been updated to a consistent state. This updateincreases the per-packet computation cost, as well as potentially addingto the latency of the system. Just as with nondistributed PEPs, theseincreased costs may result in overall degradation. Again as withnondistributed PEPs, careful monitoring of the TCP conversation allowsthe appropriate algorithms to be enabled and disabled so as to avoiddegradation.

Communication between PEP members can be accomplished in a variety ofways: through common memory or via an external message facility, like apacket-switched network or a communications bus. As the communicationsmethod becomes more expensive, the costs of the PEP cooperation increaseaccordingly, raising the crossover point to yield a PEP benefit.

There are at least two cooperation models for distributed PEPs: tightlycoupled and loosely coupled. In the tightly coupled model, communicationbetween the PEP members is inexpensive and low latency when compared tonetwork communication; this is typically provided via shared memory,although a high-speed inter-processor communication link would suffice(e.g., Myrinet, Infiniband, Ethernet, etc.). In a tightly coupled PEP,global consistency is easy to achieve, as only a single copy of the datastructures is present and simple locking schemes provide orderly andcoherent access. A tightly coupled distributed PEP can scale in allthree directions described above (performance, capacity, andreliability).

In the loosely coupled distributed PEP model, communication between thePEP members is more expensive and must be carefully considered, as theoverhead of communication between PEP members is a principal designconstraint.

In one embodiment, individual TCP connections are assigned to individualPEP members. When a PEP member receives a packet pertaining to a TCPconversation that is assigned to another PEP member, it forwards thepacket to that PEP member for processing. This method requires globalsynchronization only during connection establishment and termination, atother times no global synchronization is required. When a PEP memberreceives a connection initiation or termination packet, it communicateswith the other members to update their connection tables. Upon receiptof a connection initiation packet, the receiving PEP member determineswhich member this connection will be placed on (i.e., performs aload-balancing selection) and informs all of the PEP members of thechoice for the new connection. Once all the members have responded,indicating that their tables have been updated, the establishment of theconnection can be allowed to proceed by forwarding theconnection-initiating packet. By waiting for this globalsynchronization, the distributed PEP members will be certain tounderstand how to forward (i.e., which PEP member is responsible for)any further packets associated with this conversation. It is possiblethat two PEP members will receive connection initiation packets for thesame connection simultaneously (i.e., before they have had a chance tocommunicate). The PEP must detect this case, ensuring that theconnection table remains globally consistent; typically, one of the twopackets is simply ignored. This method guarantees that all the packetsassociated with a single TCP connection are processed by a single PEPmember, enabling the application of the PEP algorithms that requireaccess to all of the conversation data (i.e., full- or half-duplex).This model of implementing a distributed PEP does not provideperformance scaling, in that a single TCP connection can run no fasterthan the limit of a single PEP member. However, when multiple TCPconversations are present, they can be distributed among the pluralityof members so that, in aggregate, overall performance is improved, aseach individual connection has the PEP algorithms implemented on it.Another advantage of this scheme is that it is relatively easy todisable PEP algorithms for individual TCP connections. This informationcan be distributed in the same fashion, at which point any of the PEPmembers can process packets for that TCP connection without forwardingit to other PEP members, minimizing the additional latency imposed onthe connection,

Implementation of the tightly coupled model does not require a singletable for globally consistent information. The table can be distributed,provided that it is maintained consistently as packets transit themembers. Naturally, the cost of maintaining the distributed, consistenttables may result in increased latency and computation costs. However,for connections with very high RTTs, relatively expensive memberinterconnections can be utilized while still obtaining substantialsystem-level performance boosts.

Several strategies for handling failover can be realized within both thetightly and loosely coupled distribution models. A failover conditionoccurs when one of the PEP members fails, or when the network paththrough one of the PEP members ceases to operate (due to failure,operator request, routing change, etc.). Recovery is defined as theprocedure that the system uses to recover from a failover condition. Inthe tightly coupled configuration, recovery is relatively easy toperform, as the globally consistent state is still available to allremaining PEP members. Typical recovery actions involve ensuring theintegrity of shared data structures and addressing the reduction inoverall capacity due to the failure.

Recovery in a loosely coupled environment is more difficult, since notall of the PEP algorithm's information for each connection may have beenglobally synchronized, making it impossible to continue with thoseconnections (depending on the particular algorithm). If the connectioncannot be continued, then it must be resynchronized and the endpointswill need to invoke their own recovery algorithms.

Sometimes a connection can be transferred from one PEP member to anothermember. This action, called migration, can be initiated for severalreasons. One reason is due to loading issues, (i.e., a PEP member may beoverloaded and will use the migration of a TCP connection to a differentPEP member as a method of rebalancing the system load). Another reasonis external routing change, (i.e., one PEP member may notice that thepreponderance of packets for a TCP conversation is arriving at a PEPmember that does not own the connection; rather than continuing to paythe costs of internally forwarding those packets to the owning member,the connection is migrated to the member that is receiving thepreponderance of packets). Another reason is route failure. The owningPEP member may lose connectivity to one or both of the endpoints. Theconnection is migrated to another PEP member to reestablishconnectivity. Yet another reason is member failure. Connections owned bya failing member are migrated to operational members.

Migration is similar to connection establishment. First, packetforwarding for the connection is suspended. Second, the connection tableof the PEP members is updated to indicate the new owner. Finally, packetforwarding is enabled (naturally, any packets received, during thisprocess must be forwarded to the new owner).

PEP Deployment

When adding an enhanced PEP to a network, there are many choices for thedeployment vehicle. One method of deployment is to create a new interiorelement. This element may have one or more network connections and maycontain facilities for performing the selected enhanced PEP algorithmson the packets that flow through it. Another option is to deploy theenhanced PEP within an already existing element, either interior orendpoint. In general, an enhanced PEP can be deployed in either anendpoint or interior element configuration. As described above, networktopology affects the classes of enhanced PEP algorithms that can beenabled. Multiple deployed implementations of enhanced PEPs, either inendpoints or interior nodes or both, may cooperate to create a singledistributed enhanced PEP instance, as described above. In this section,enhanced PEPs (or flow control module) may be referenced as a PEP forease of discussion.

Certain network interior nodes are natural places to deploy PEPS, asthey tend to aggregate network traffic, reducing the number of membersrequired to create a distributed PEP instance. Additionally, these nodestend to be the most profitable places to locate performance-boosting PEPalgorithms. For example, a wireless base station is a natural place todeploy a PEP, as all traffic between wireless nodes and the wirednetwork must pass through it. Further, there are many PEP algorithmsthat would be ideal in improving the performance of the high error-ratewireless link.

Another natural PEP deployment point is the Virtual Private Networkgateway (VPN). FIG. 1 depicts one example of a VPN gateway. Computers100-103 are connected to switch 150. Communication between computers100-103 are routed amongst each other by switch 150, as directed by therouting tables contained therein. Likewise, computers 140-143communicate through switch 160, to which they are connected.

When one of computers 100-103 (100 in further usage) sends a packetdestined for one of computers 140-143 (140 in further usage), switch150, using its routing tables, directs these packets to VPN gateway 110.VPN 110 accepts these packets and inspects them. Using its own routingtables, VPN 110 determines that these packets must be forwarded to VPN130. Each of the packets to be forwarded is placed into an envelope thatspecifies VPN 130 as the destination and then the packet is sent toInternet 120. Wide area network (WAN) (e.g., Internet) 120 forwards thepacket to VPN 130, which removes the packet from its envelope andforwards it to switch 160, which then forwards it to computer 140.Because the packet, while traveling over the Internet, is placed insidean envelope, the contents and format of the original packet do notaffect, and are unaffected by, its transport via Internet 120.Typically, cryptographic techniques are used to hide the contents of thepacket, ensuring that no intermediate node is able to examine thepacket. Other cryptographic techniques can be employed to allow thereceiving node to detect if a packet has been altered after initialtransmission. In this case, the altered packet can simply be dropped,whereupon the upper-level behavior will detect this and retransmit anoriginal copy. Note that Internet 120 need not be the public Internet,it could be any particular network, public or private. Note further thatthe use of the term “switch” should be understood to include all formsof switching, including routing, bridging, forwarding, and others.

This technique allows the use of Internet 120 as a private link betweenthe two VPN instances. Indeed, the addressing domain of the packets usedby computers 100-103 and 140-143 and switches 130 and 160 are distinctand possibly separate from that used by Internet 120. Further, thepackets contained within the envelopes may contain protocols unknown toInternet 120.

The transport of the contained packets through the Internet in thisfashion is commonly known as tunneling. The network interface thatconnects the VPN to Internet 120 is can be referenced as the wide-areanetwork (WAN) side. The other VPN network interface is known as thelocal-area network (LAN) side. Note that in some configurations, theseparation of WAN and LAN-sides of the VPN is logical and not physical(i.e., there may be only a single network connection over which bothsets of traffic are multiplexed). VPN 110 may be combined with switch130, yielding certain efficiencies due to sharing of resources andcomputations. Likewise, VPN 140 may be combined with switch 160.

When computer 100 and computer 140 communicate using the TCP protocol,VPN 110 and 130 typically perform little or no special processing, ascompared to the other Internet protocols. Each TCP packet is placed intoits envelope and transmitted to the other VPN participant. Each TCPendpoint remains ignorant of the presence of the intermediate VPN nodesor of Internet 120.

There are many choices for the protocol used for the VPN tunnel. Two ofthe most common protocols are: Internet Protocol Security (IPSec) andLayer 2 Tunneling Protocol (L2TP). These protocols do not providereliable communications, as they simply layer over IP with minimaladditional services. Another common protocol is Point to Point TunnelingProtocol (PPTP), which uses an additional TCP connection to providereliable communication between the two VPN nodes. For those tunnelingprotocols that use unreliable communications, the TCP endpoints remainsolely responsible for the upper-level TCP behaviors, as these VPNprotocols do not provide them.

In the case of PPTP (as well as other protocols that use TCP for thetunnel), the VPN's upper-level TCP behaviors may interact with theupper-level TCP behaviors of the endpoints (computers 100 and 140). Thisinteraction may severely limit the performance of the TCP connectionbetween computers 100 and 140. For example, packets that are dropped byInternet 120 must be retransmitted. Initially, one of the VPN nodesnotices that a packet has been dropped, using one of the known TCPmethods: duplicate acknowledgements (dupacks) or selectiveacknowledgements (sacks), retransmitting the lost packet accordingly.However, while the VPN has initiated a retransmit, the TCPimplementations in the endpoint computers 100 and 140 may alsoexperience a timeout, since the retransmit by the VPN may takesubstantially longer than the endpoint's current running estimate of theRTT. In this case, the endpoints will also assume that the packet hasbeen lost and perform their own retransmit. The endpoint retransmit isredundant, as the VPNs are already engaged in retransmitting the missingdata. This entire sequence results in an overall degradation of systemthroughput. The redundantly retransmitted packets may be treated by theVPN as additional packets to be transmitted (i.e., the VPN may fail torecognize a packet received from an endpoint as representing aretransmission, packaging the redundant packet and sending it across thetunnel, also).

There are several ways that a PEP, inserted into the conversationbetween the endpoint and the VPN, could improve this situation. In oneway, upon detecting the unnecessary retransmission, the PEP could simplydrop the redundant packet. Detecting the situation requires that the PEPhave access to state information for the VPN's TCP (tunnel) connection.This access could be performed in several manners. First, the PEP couldbe in the same node as the VPN and could access the VPN transmissionstate directly. Second, the PEP could be connected to the WAN side ofthe VPN, monitoring its packets directly to detect retransmissions.Thirdly, the VPN could explicitly notify the PEP via a message when aretransmission occurs.

As described above, some VPN algorithms use cryptographic techniques toprohibit inspection and/or alteration of the encapsulated packets. Ifthe PEP is connected to the LAN side of the VPN, then it can apply itsalgorithms to packets prior to their encapsulation, avoidingcryptographic issues. However, a PEP connected to the WAN side of theVPN may be severely limited in the presence of cryptographic protectiontechniques if it has no access to the clear-text of the encapsulatedpackets. But, in the case of a VPN tunnel using TCP (e.g., PPTP), thePEP algorithms may be applied to the TCP envelope, provided that thecryptographic techniques are used only to protect the interior packetand not the envelope. With support for a cryptographic NIC, even thisrestriction can be removed (as further described below).

Just as it is possible currently to achieve efficiencies by combiningVPNs with switches, it is possible to achieve similar efficiencies bycombining PEPs with VPNs, PEPs with switches, and PEPs with combinedVPN/switches. Further, unexpected benefits beyond simple integration areobtained from such a combination, as described below.

The typical data center configuration results in the principal bandwidthbottleneck occurring right at the VPN node. In such a configuration, theVPN node has a high-speed connection to the LAN and a much lower-speedconnection to the WAN. Indeed, when the VPN is integrated into a switch,this mismatch is accentuated, as the VPN may have access to all of thetraffic across all the LAN ports of the switch, which usually greatlyexceeds the speed of a single WAN link. Further, the connections thatpass through the VPN normally have higher RTTs and packet-loss ratesthan do LAN connections, particularly when the VPN uses the publicInternet as its tunnel transport.

The VPN is a natural place for making bandwidth allocation decisions;however, the standard VPN lacks efficient mechanisms to implement thesedecisions. The only bandwidth allocation technique available to thestandard VPN is to drop packets, assuming that the sender will reducehis sending rate appropriately. However, this technique is inefficient,resulting in retransmission of data that was otherwise properlyreceived. Further, the technique lacks the ability to provide a fineresolution to the permitted bandwidth, particularly when the sender isusing TCP. This is because standard TCP implementations reduce theirbandwidth by one-half when a packet is dropped. Also, many TCPimplementations will provide data in bursts rather than evenly spacedafter a packet drop.

A better flow control mechanism allows the VPN to manipulate the receivewindow seen by a sending endpoint. Also, since a TCP acknowledgementcontains a window advertisement, a VPN can manipulate the window toprovide a more effective form of flow control. Thus, the VPN is able tomore precisely inform and control the sending rate of the endpoint.However, window manipulation is limited, as once the window is opened toa certain value, the receiver is not permitted to retract theadvertisement unless the data has been received accordingly. Thislimitation imposes a time lag between the decision to reduce a sender'srate and the actual realization of that rate reduction. This ratelimiting mechanism can be used by a VPN to efficiently provide afine-grained control over individual connections.

Other benefits occur when a PEP is combined with a VPN. This combinationallows the PEP to have access to clear-text packets lackingcryptographic protection, allowing the maximum opportunities to provideperformance enhancements.

Preacks

Alternative embodiments of a flow control module (an enhanced PEP)handles the acknowledgements and retransmits for a sender, effectivelyterminating the sender's connection with the downstream portion of anetwork connection. Such a PEP can be implemented in a variety ofnetwork topologies. Again, in this section the enhanced PEP (or flowcontrol module) is referenced as a PEP for ease of discussion.

As an example, FIG. 2 shows one possible deployment of a PEP 200 into anetwork architecture to implement this feature. In this architecture, asender computer 100 sends data to switch 150, which determines that thedata are destined for VPN box 130. Because of the chosen LAN topology,all data destined for VPN 130 must transit PEP 200, so the PEP 200 canapply any necessary algorithms to these data. FIG. 17 illustrates atrace diagram for one embodiment of the flow of information among thesender 100, the PEP 200, and a VPN 130 (or any other network entitydownstream on the network connection).

As shown in FIG. 17, the sender 100 transmits 1705 a packet, which isreceived by the PEP 200. When the PEP 200 sees the packet, which istransmitted from the sender 100 to a recipient via the VPN 130, the PEP200 retains 1710 a copy of the packet and forwards 1715 the packetdownstream to the VPN 130. The then generates an acknowledgement packet(ACK) and sends 1720 the ACK back to the sender 100, or sendingendpoint. This ACK, a pre-acknowledgment, causes the sender 100 tobelieve that the packet has been delivered successfully, freeing thesender's resources for subsequent processing. The PEP 200 retains thecopy of the packet data in the event that a retransmission of the packetis required, so that the sender 100 does not have to handleretransmissions of the data. This early generation of acknowledgementsmay be called “preacking.”

If 1725 a retransmission of the packet is required, the PEP 200retransmits 1730 the packet containing the missing data. The PEP 200 maydetermine whether retransmission is required as a sender would in atraditional system, for example, determining that a packet is lost if anacknowledgement has not been received for the packet after apredetermined amount of time. To this end, the PEP 200 monitorsacknowledgements generated by the receiving endpoint (or any otherdownstream network entity) so that it can determine whether the packethas been successfully delivered or needs to be retransmitted. If 1725the PEP 200 determines that the packet has been successfully delivered,the PEP 200 is free to discard 1735 the saved packet data. The PEP 200may also inhibit forwarding acknowledgements for packets that havealready been received by the sending endpoint.

In the embodiment described above, the PEP 200 controls the sender 100through the delivery of pre-acknowledgements, or preacks, as though thePEP 200 were the receiving endpoint itself. But because the PEP 200 isnot an endpoint and does not actually consume the data, the PEP 200preferably includes a mechanism for providing overflow control to thesending endpoint. Without overflow control, the PEP 200 could run out ofmemory because, as explained above, the PEP 200 stores packets that havebeen preacked to the sending endpoint but not yet acknowledged asreceived by the receiving endpoint. Therefore, in a situation in whichthe sender 100 transmits packets to the PEP 200 faster than the PEP 200can forward the packets downstream, the memory available in the PEP 200to store unacknowledged packet data can quickly fill. A mechanism foroverflow control allows the PEP 200 to control transmission of thepackets from the sender 100 to avoid this problem.

In the embodiment described in connection with FIG. 17, the PEP 200includes an inherent “self-clocking” overflow control mechanism. Thisself-clocking is due to the order in which the PEP 200 may be designedto transmit A50 packets downstream and send A55 ACKs to the sender 100.In the embodiment shown in FIG. 17, the PEP 200 does not preack A55 thepacket until after it transmits A50 the packet downstream. In this way,the sender 100 will receive the ACKs at the rate at which the PEP 200 isable to transmit packets rather than the rate at which the PEP 200receives packets from the sender 100. This helps to regulate thetransmission of packets from the sender 100.

Another overflow control mechanism that the PEP 200 may implement is touse the standard TCP window, which tells the sender 100 how much bufferthe receiver is permitting the sender to fill up. A nonzero window size(e.g., a size of at least one Maximum Segment Size (MSS)) in a preackpermits the sending endpoint to continue to deliver data to the PEP,whereas a zero window size inhibits further data transmission.Accordingly, the PEP 200 may regulate the flow of packets from thesender 100, for example when the PEP's buffer is becoming full, byappropriately setting the TCP window size in each preack. This schemehas the advantages of simplicity and adherence to standard TCPmethodologies.

A potential disadvantage of using TCP window size in this way, however,is the high expense of ACK processing. In the steady-state case, whenthe sending endpoint has a higher bandwidth to the PEP than the PEP toreceiving endpoint path, two ACK packets are sent by the PEP, as well asprocessed by the sending endpoint, for every packet sent by the sender.This occurs as follows: Due to the bandwidth imbalance, the sender willeventually fill the PEP (i.e., exhaust the PEP's advertised receivewindow to the sender), causing the PEP to generate a zero window sizeACK packet. Eventually, the link between the PEP and the receivingendpoint, which is slower, will succeed in delivering a packet, causingthe PEP to realize that it is no longer full. The PEP then sends apacket to the sending endpoint, indicating a nonzero window (e.g., thespace for the packet just delivered), causing the sending endpoint todeliver another packet, in turn causing the PEP to generate, once again,a zero window size ACK packet to prevent the sender from sendingpackets. Hence, for every packet sent by the sender to the PEP, thereare two ACK packets sent from the PEP back to the sender (one each witha zero and a nonzero window size).

One technique to reduce this additional overhead is to apply hysteresis.When the PEP 200 delivers data to the slower side, the overflow controlmechanism in the PEP 200 can require that a minimum amount of space beavailable before sending a nonzero window advertisement to the sender100. In one embodiment, the PEP 200 waits until there is a minimum offour packets of space available before sending a nonzero window packet(in this case, a window size of four packets). This reduces the overheadby approximately a factor four, since only two ACK packets are sent foreach group of four data packets, instead of eight ACK packets for fourdata packets. However, this may increase the “burstiness” of thedelivery of packets, since the sender's window is opened four packets ata time.

Another technique for overflow control is to use the TCP delayed ACKmechanism, which skips ACKs to reduce network traffic. Standard TCPdelayed ACKs automatically delay the sending of an ACK, either until twopackets are received or until a fixed timeout has occurred. Thismechanism alone can result in cutting the overhead in half; moreover, byincreasing the numbers of packets above two, additional overheadreduction is realized. But merely delaying the ACK itself may beinsufficient to control overflow, and the PEP 200 may also use theadvertised window mechanism on the ACKs to control the sender 100. Whendoing this, the PEP 200 preferably avoids triggering the timeoutmechanism of the sender by delaying the ACK too long. Accordingly, thePEP delay should be designed with this concern in mind, avoidingdelaying an ACK, if possible, so long that it will cause a timeout inthe sender 100.

In one embodiment, the PEP does not preack the last packet of a group ofpackets. By not preacking the last packet, or at least one of thepackets in the group, the PEP avoids a false acknowledgement for a groupof packets. For example, if the PEP were to send a preack for a lastpacket and the packet were subsequently lost, the sender would have beentricked into thinking that the packet is delivered when it was notThinking that the packet had been delivered, the sender could discardthat data. If the PEP also lost the packet, there would be no way toretransmit the packet to the recipient. By not preacking the last packetof a group of packets, the sender will not discard the packet until ithas been delivered. Accordingly, this problem is avoided.

This preacking technique may also be employed at downstream entities,for example just before the recipient. At a downstream PEP, coupled tothe recipient, there are a number of options for handling packets andacknowledgements. In one case, the downstream PEP may preack receivedpackets just as described in connection with FIG. 17. Alternatively, thedownstream PEP may avoid preacking, instead waiting to send back an ACKuntil the recipient acknowledges receipt of the packet. In a thirdtechnique, the downstream PEP sends a SACK after it receives andforwards a packet, but waits to send an ACK until the recipient actuallyacknowledges receipt of the packet. This gives the sender-side PEPinformation about whether the packet passes through the downstream PEPas well as when it arrives at its destination. This is good when theconnection fails, as this technique provides the network entities themost information about the status of the packets.

FIG. 18 illustrates one embodiment of a PEP 200, which includes anoverflow control module 18 10, a memory 1820, a network interface 1830,and a preack module 1840. The network interface 1830 allows the PEP 200to communicate with other network entities, such as the sender and theVPN. The PEP 200 store packet data received from the network in itsmemory 1820, which may be logically partitioned into separate receiveand transmit buffers. Additionally, the overflow control module 18 10 iscoupled to the network interface 1830 to implement one or more of theflow control mechanisms described above. The preack module 1840 isconfigured to send early acknowledgements, or preacks, to the sender100.

There are many ramifications of preacking, both beneficial anddetrimental. In the situation described, preacking is beneficial becauseit eliminates the need to retransmit packets by the endpoint, therebysaving sender-side bandwidth and sender-side transmission delays (i.e.,a reduction in latency). It can be appreciated that this benefit isaccentuated in a number of situations, for example before a high-losslink in a network connection, at a point of bandwidth mismatch where thedownstream portion of the network connection has a lower bandwidth(i.e., a bottleneck), and at a point of latency transition in thenetwork connection. Another benefit of this technique is to eliminatethe RTT limitation on the upper bound of TCP performance. But preackingmay have detrimental effects as well. For example, failure of the PEPinstance may result in the two endpoints of the TCP conversationbecoming unsynchronized.

Window Virtualization

As previously noted, insufficient receive window size is one limiter ofTCP performance. The receive window sizes of many TCP implementationsare limited for various reasons. One reason for the limitation may be alack of support for well-known protocol extensions (e.g., RFC 1323),that allow the receive window to be increased beyond its standard 16-bitrange. Another reason may be the desire to limit the consumption ofsystem buffer memory by each TCP connection, since the advertisedreceive window carries a promise of dedicated buffer space. The latteris especially crucial in certain system configurations that may havelarge numbers of relatively idle TCP connections open at any instant.Usually, default window-size settings are set for LAN environments, asthese tend to dominate connections in most environments.

Though it is not immediately apparent from examining conventionalliterature such as RFC 1323, there is effectively a send window, also.The send window is similar to the ‘receive window, in that it consumesbuffer space (though on the sender), and sometimes serves to limitperformance. The sender's send window consists of all data sent by theapplication that has not been acknowledged by the receiver. This datamust be retained in memory in case retransmission is required. Sincememory is a shared resource, TCP stack implementations limit the size ofthis data.

When the send window is full, an attempt by an application program tosend more data results in blocking the application program until spaceis available. Subsequent reception of acknowledgements will freesend-window memory and unblock the application program. This window sizeis known as the socket buffer size in some TCP implementations. Unlikethe receive window, no network interoperability standard limits the sizeof the send window, although, many implementations either provide afixed limit or require source code modifications to utilize a largerwindow. Thus, although there appears to be promise of reserved memorythe practical reality is otherwise. Thus, the flow control module (orenhanced PEP) is configured as described herein to provide access toincreased window (or buffer) sizes. This configuration may also bereferenced to as window virtualization. In one embodiment, “window” maybe referenced in a context of send, receive, or both.

One method of window virtualization is to insert a preacking PEP into aTCP session (or conversation). FIG. 19 illustrates one embodiment of aflow control system 20 including a first flow control module 220 and asecond flow control module 230 for use in transporting data from a firstnode, e.g., computer 100, to a second node, e.g., computer 140. Inaddition, the flow control system may have coupled with a third node,e.g., computer 175, which communicatively couples the wide area network120.

The flow control system 20 includes a one or more first (or initiating)nodes, e.g., computers 100-1 03, a first switch 150 (which may include anetwork such as a local area network (LAN)), a first flow control module220, a wide area network (e.g., the Internet) 120, a second flow controlmodule 230, a second switch 160 (which also may include a network suchas a LAN), and one or more second (or responding) nodes, e.g., computers140-143. The one or more first nodes 100-103 couple the first switch150. The first flow control module 220 couples the first switch 150 andthe wide area network 120. The second flow control module 230 couplesthe wide area network 120 and the second switch 160. The second switch160 couples the one or more second nodes 140-143. As noted above, theflow control modules 220,230 may also be referred to as enhancedperformance enhanced proxies (PEP), or simply, PEPS in this section foreach of discussion.

Note: in one embodiment, the components between the one or more firstnodes, e.g., source (or initiating or sender or sending) nodes, and theone or more second nodes, e.g., the destination (or responding orreceiver or receiving) nodes, may be referenced as points (orintermediary nodes) along a data path between these end nodes in theflow control system 20. In addition, it is noted that the flow controlmodules 220, 230 may be configured in hardware, software (includingfirmware), or a combination thereof. For example, the flow controlmodule 220,230 may be a physical device configured to execute softwareembodying processes described herein through a processing mechanism(e.g., processor, controller, or state machine) or it may be a softwarecomponent embodying processes described herein residing within a networkpoint, e.g., a switch or router, to operate within and/or in conjunctionwith that network point.

In communications initiated at a first node (e.g., 100), how thatcommunication traverses the flow control system 20 and uses window (orbuffer) virtualization depends upon whether the communication isdestined for a second node (e.g., 140) in the flow control system 20 ora third node 175 that is, outside the flow control system 20. To handleeach situation each flow control node 220,230 is configured to allow aprocess for auto-discovery. When auto-discovery identifies appropriateflow control modules, e.g., 220, 230,—additional mechanisms andprocesses are leveraged for increasing session window sizes and bufferutilization along points in a data path.

Auto-discovery may be configured when establishing a communicationconnection, for example, in TCP environments during synchronization(SYN) and synchronization acknowledgement (SYN-ACK). In particular, withauto-discovery, one embodiment of the present system and processinvolves using a modified synchronization (SYN) and synchronizationacknowledgement (SYN-ACK) structure in the flow control system 20 todetermine whether a particular point from a first node to a second nodeis enabled as a flow control module.

Referring briefly to FIG. 20, it illustrates one embodiment of a datapacket 2010 for use in a flow control system 20 in accordance with thepresent invention. The data packet includes an Ethernet header 2020, anInternet protocol (“IP”) header, 2030, a transmission control protocol(“TCP”) header 2040, and data 2050. In the IP header 2030 and the TCPheader 2040 there are corresponding options area 2035, 2045. Inaddition, the TCP header also includes a bit string corresponding to awindow scale 2055.

Turning now to FIG. 21, illustrated is initiation of a datacommunication session between a source node, e.g., computer 100 (forease of discussion, now referenced as source node 100), and adestination node, e.g., computer 140 (for ease of discussion, nowreferenced as destination node 100) in accordance with the presentinvention. For TCP communications, the source node 100 initiallytransmits a synchronization signal (“SYN”) through its local areanetwork 150 to first flow control module 220. The first flow controlmodule 220 inserts a configuration identifier into the TCP header 2040options area 2045. The configuration identifier, e.g., FCM, identifiesthis point in the data path as a flow control module.

The SYN-FCM signal continues onto the wide area network 120 to thesecond flow control module 230. Unlike conventional points in the datapath, the second flow control module 230 recognizes the configurationidentifier in the TCP header 2040 options area 2045 and extracts thatinformation to store it. It can be stored in any storage mechanism,e.g., a state block, a volatile memory, a non-volatile memory, diskstorage, or the like. The second flow control module 230 optionallyforwards the SYN-FCM signal or the SYN signal to the destination node140 via the destination node's local area network 160. Note that if theSYN-FCM signal is sent, the destination node 140 will ignore theconfiguration identifier in the TCP header 2040 options area.2045.

Upon receipt of the SYN-FCM or SYN signal, the destination node 140returns a synchronization acknowledgement (“SYN-ACK”) signal for thesource node 100. The second flow control module 230 receives the SYN-ACKsignal and inserts its configuration identifier i into the TCP header2040 options area 2045 of the SYN-ACK signal. The SYN-ACK signal withthe second flow control module configuration identifier (SYN-ACK-FCM) istransmitted through the wide area network 120 to the first flow controlmodule 220. The first flow control module recognizes the configurationidentifier in the TCP header 2040 options area 2045 and extracts it forstorage. The first flow control module 220 passes the SYN-ACK-FCM or aSYN-ACK signal to the source node 100, which ignores the configurationidentifier in the TCP header 2040 options area 2045 if it receives theSYN-ACK-FCM signal.

With the session initiated, the flow control system 20 is now able toidentify the first flow control module 220 and the second flow controlmodule 230 in the data path. In this identified configuration, theconnection between the local area networks 150,160 and the respectiveflow control modules 220,230 can be referenced as a fast sideconnection, e.g., having gigabit connection speeds and low latencies,while the connection between the two flow control modules 220,230 can bereferenced as a slow side connection, e.g., having megabit connectionspeeds and high latency (e.g., with respect to the fast sideconnection).

Note that if the source node 100 initiates a session with a node 175 inwhich there is no other flow control module other than the first flowcontrol module 220, the flow control module does not interfere, orprovides a passive conduit, between the source node 100 and the outsidenode 175. In this situation, the when the SYN-FCM signal goes from theflow control module 220 to the outside node 175, the outside nodeignores the configuration identifier (FCM) and returns a SYN-ACK to theflow control module 220 that ultimately goes back to the source node100. Thus, in this situation, the flow control module 220 would not befurther configured to provide enhanced PEP services as described herein.In this case, the flow control module 220 may be considered to have twofast sides to its connection. In addition, in alternative embodiments ofsuch situations, the flow control module may perform fast sideoptimizations, such as improved retransmit support, which could beuseful near a link with media losses such as a wireless (e.g., WiFi)base station.

In addition to auto-discovery, the flow control modules 220,230, alsoprovide window virtualization. Window (or buffer) virtualization allowsincreasing data buffering capabilities within a session despite havingend nodes with small buffer sizes, e.g., typically 16 k bytes. However,RFC 1323 requires window scaling for any buffer sizes greater than 64 kbytes, which must be set at the time of session initialization (SYN,SYN-ACK signals). Moreover, the window scaling corresponds to the lowestcommon denominator in the data path, often an end node with small buffersize. This window scale often is a scale of 0 or 1, which corresponds toa buffer size of up to 64 k or 128 k bytes. Note that because the windowsize is defined as the window field in each packet shifted over by thewindow scale, the window scale establishes an upper limit for thebuffer, but does not guarantee the buffer is actually that large. Eachpacket indicates the current available buffer space at the receiver inthe window field.

FIG. 22 illustrates one embodiment of scaling in a flow control systemin accordance with the present invention. Specifically, duringconnection establishment (i.e., initialization of a session) when thefirst flow control module 220 receives from the source node 100 the SYNsignal (or packet), it stores the windows scale of the source node 100(which is the previous node) or stores a 0 for window scale if the scaleof the previous node is missing. The first flow control module 220 alsomodifies the scale, e.g., increases the scale to 4 from 0 or 1, in theSYN-FCM signal. When the second flow control module 230 receives the SYNsignal, it stores the increased scale from the first flow control signal4 and resets the scale in the SYN signal back to the source node 100scale value for transmission to the destination node 140. When thesecond flow 230 receives the SYN-ACK signal fiom the destination node140, it stores the scale fiom the destination node 140 scale, e.g., 0 or1, and modifies it to an increased scale that is sent with theSYN-ACK-FCM signal. The first flow control node 220 receives and notesthe received window scale and revises the windows scale sent back to thesource node 100 back down to the original scale, e.g., 0 or 1. Based onthe above window shift conversation during connection establishment, thewindow field in every subsequent packet, e.g., TCP packet, of thesession must be shifted according to the window shift conversion.

The process described above may also apply to non-flow control modules.For example, if there is only one flow control module in the data path,e.g., the first flow control module 220, and the destination node is anoutside node 175, the process can use the increased scale between thefirst flow control module 220 and the outside node 175 when the outsidenode 175 is configured to also use a similar increased scale, e.g., awindows scale of 4. As with the above case, in this case also the flowcontrol module, e.g., here 220, will serve to “translate” the windowscale on each side of the flow control module 220 in a manner that istransparent to the individual end nodes 100, 175 during communicationbetween them.

The window scale, as described above, expresses buffer sizes of over 64k and may not be required for window virtualization. Thus, shifts forwindow scale may be used to express increased buffer capacity in eachflow control module 220,230. This increase in buffer capacity in may bereferenced as window (or buffer) virtualization. The increase in buffersize allows greater packet through put from and to the respective endnodes 100, 140. Note that buffer sizes in TCP are typically expressed interms of bytes, but for ease of discussion “packets” may be used in thedescription herein as it relates to virtualization.

FIG. 23 illustrates one example of window (or buffer) virtualization ina flow control system in accordance with the present invention. In thisexample, the source node 100 and the destination node 140 are configuredsimilar to conventional end nodes having a limited buffer capacity of16k bytes, which equals approximately 10 packets of data. Typically, anend node 100, 140 must wait until the packet is transmitted andconfirmation is received before a next group of packets can betransmitted.

In one embodiment, using increased buffer capacity in the flow controlmodules 220, 230, when the source node 100 transmits its 10 datapackets, the first flow control module 220 receives the packets, storesit in its larger capacity buffer, e.g., 512 packet capacity, andimmediately sends back an acknowledgement signal indicating receipt ofthe packets (“REC-ACK”) back to the source node 100. The source node canthen “flush” its current buffer, load it with 10 new data packets, andtransmit those onto the first flow control module 220. Again, the firstflow control module 220 transmits a REC-ACK signal back to the sourcenode 100 and the source node 100 flushes its buffer and loads it with 10more new packets for transmission.

As the first flow control module 220 receives the data packets from thesource nodes, it loads up its buffer accordingly. When its ready totransmit the first flow control module 220 can begin transmitting thedata packets to the second flow control module 230, which also has anincreased buffer size, for example, to receive 512 packets. The secondflow control module 230 receives the data packets and begins to transmit10 packets at a time to the destination node 140. Each REC-ACK receivedat the second flow control node 230 from the destination node 140results in 10 more packets being transmitted to the destination node 140until all the data packets are transferred. Hence, the present inventionis able to increase data transmission throughput between the source node(sender) 100 and the destination node (receiver) 140 by taking advantageof the larger buffer in the flow control modules 220,230 between thedevices.

It is noted that by “preacking” the transmission of data as describedpreviously, a sender (or source node 100) is allowed to transmit moredata than is possible without the preacks, thus affecting a largerwindow size. For example, in one embodiment this technique is effectivewhen the flow control module 220, 230 is located “near” a node (e.g.,source node 100 or destination node 140) that lacks large windows. Ifboth communicants are lacking large windows, then two flow controlmodules 220, 230 may be required, one near each node 100, 140 to obtaingreater performance.

In one embodiment, “near” may be referenced as a bandwidth delay productof the path between a source node 100 or destination node 140 (e.g.,endpoints) and the flow control module 220, 230 is less than the maximumwindow size supported by the end nodes 100,140. If the flow controlmodule 220, 230 is “farther” away, some performance enhancement maystill be provided, but the maximum may be limited by the insufficientwindow size (e.g., TCP window size) between the end node 100,140 and theflow control module 220, 230.

In some embodiments, for greater performance, the flow control module,e.g., 220, can be configured to cause the source node 100 (or sender) toprovide enough data to fill both the source node-to-flow control modulepath and the flow control module-to-destination (or receiver) path. Whengenerating a preack for a packet received from the source node 100, theflow control module 220 performs an appropriate computation as describedherein to determine the buffer size to place into the packet (i.e., thewindow size to advertise).

It is noted that alternative forms of window virtualization can beperformed. For example, the flow control module could simply alter thecontents of the advertised receive window as packets transited it. Thiscould cause the advertisement of a larger window than the endpoint wasactually offering. This might not be a problem, as the endpoint nodemight be capable of processing the data at a high enough rate to avoidoverflowing.

Because the destination node 140 is still acknowledging the receipt ofthe packets through the flow control module 230, the flow control module230 itself could monitor the inflow of data, holding up the transmissionof packets that would overrun the window of the destination node 140.These packets could be stored locally until space became available atthe destination node 140. Alternatively, the overflow packets could bedropped, eventually causing a retransmission. In either scenario, theflow control module 220,230 could monitor the rate that the destinationnode 140 is absorbing data and limit the increase in the advertised sendwindow so as to minimize overruns.

Another optimization with respect to window sizing can be applied. Forexample, many TCP implementations advertise a fixed window size for eachTCP connection (actually a fixed maximum). However, TCP performance doesnot increase substantially when the window size is increased beyond thebandwidth delay product of the connection. Further, the advertisedwindow size implies an equivalent reservation of system buffer memory.Thus, for connections with a bandwidth delay product less than themaximum window size, excess memory is reserved; while connections with abandwidth delay product exceeding the fixed maximum experiencesperformance loss.

Note that a fixed maximum window size may be either wasteful of memoryor underutilizes available bandwidth or both. To help address this,there can be configured an advertised window size that more closelytracks the bandwidth delay product of the TCP connection. Oneimplementation of this permits each endpoint to monitor its currentthroughput and adjust its advertised window size (and the associatedbuffering) accordingly. Another method sets a relatively small fixedwindow size and uses a flow control module 220, 230, located within thebandwidth delay product range of the small window size, to provide themonitoring required to adjust the window size accordingly. The flowcontrol module 220, 230 can optimize the window size of each individualconnection so as to better utilize buffer memory.

Recongestion

Another enhanced PEP algorithm is recongestion. Once again, the enhancedPEP (or flow control module) is referred to as PEP for ease ofdiscussion in this section. The standard TCP congestion avoidancealgorithms are known to perform poorly in the face of certain networkconditions, including: large RTTs, high packet loss rates, and others.When the PEP detects one of these conditions, it intervenes,substituting an alternate congestion avoidance algorithm that bettersuits the particular network conditions.

This PEP algorithm uses preacks to effectively terminate the connectionbetween the sender and the receiver. It then resends the packets fromitself to the receiver, using a different congestion avoidancealgorithm. For maximum performance, the PEP should be located near thesender, as the connection between the sender and the PEP may serve tolimit overall performance.

Recongestion algorithms are dependent on the characteristics of the TCPconnection. An optimal algorithm for large RTT connections may performpoorly in a small RTT environment. The PEP monitors each TCP connection,characterizing it with respect to the different dimensions, selecting arecongestion algorithm that is appropriate for the currentcharacterization.

In a preferred embodiment, upon detecting a TCP connection that islimited by RTT, a recongestion algorithm is applied which behaves asmultiple TCP connections. Each TCP connection operates within its ownperformance limit but the aggregate bandwidth achieves a higherperformance level. One parameter in this mechanism is the number ofparallel connections that are applied (N). Too large a value of N andthe connection bundle achieves more than its fair share of bandwidth.Too small a value of N and the connection bundle achieves less than itsfair share of bandwidth.

One method of establishing “N” relies on the PEP monitoring the packetloss rate, RTT, and packet size of the actual connection. These numbersare plugged into the TCP response curve formula (see Mathis, et al.) toprovide an upper limit on the performance of a single TCP connection inthe present configuration. If the each connection within the connectionbundle is achieving substantially the same performance as that computedto be the upper limit, then additional parallel connections are applied.If the current bundle is achieving less performance than the upperlimit, the number of parallel connections is reduced. In this manner,the overall fairness of the system is maintained since individualconnection bundles contain no more parallelism than is required toeliminate the restrictions imposed by the protocol itself. Further, eachindividual connection retains TCP compliance.

Another method of establishing “N” is to utilize a parallel flow controlalgorithm such as the TCP “Vegas” algorithm or its improved version“Stabilized Vegas.” In this method, the network information associatedwith the connections in the connection bundle (e.g., RTT, loss rate,average packet size, etc.) is aggregated and applied to the alternateflow control algorithm. The results of this algorithm are in turndistributed among the connections of the bundle controlling their number(i.e., N). Optionally, each connection within the bundle continues usingthe standard TCP congestion avoidance algorithm.

In a preferred embodiment, the individual connections within a parallelbundle are virtualized, i.e., actual individual TCP connections are notestablished. Instead the congestion avoidance algorithm is modified tobehave as though there were N parallel connections (more details below).This method has the advantage of appearing to transiting network nodesas a single connection. Thus the QoS, security and other monitoringmethods of these nodes are unaffected by the recongestion algorithm.

In an alternate embodiment, the individual connections within a parallelbundle are real, i.e., a separate TCP connection is established for eachof the parallel connections within a bundle. The congestion avoidancealgorithm for each TCP connection need not be modified. However,transiting nodes will now see “N” separate connections and this mayalter their behavior. Other implementation difficulties exist, as the,sending PEP may not always be able to open an additional connection tothe receiving PEP.

FIG. 10 depicts the architecture of a system with two PEPS (200 and 300)and a network address translation (NAT) device 1000. In this example,computer 100 (sender, source, or initiator) opens a TCP connection tocomputer 140 (receiver, destination or responder), resulting in thetransfer of a large amount of data from computer 140 back to computer100 (e.g., fetching a file via FTP, accessing a web page, etc.). The PEP300 determines that the performance of the data transfer is limited andacts to increase the parallelism. In the preferred embodiment withvirtual connection bundles, the PEP 300 uses the alternate congestioncontrol algorithm to send data at the higher rate.

In an alternate embodiment with real connections, PEP 300 may be unableto directly open a connection to PEP 200 since it is behind a NAT device(this is a limitation of NAT devices). In this situation, PEP 300 adds aTCP option to one of the TCP packets indicating the need for anadditional connection (or alternately, the number of additionalconnections needed). When PEP 200 receives a packet with this option, itinitiates a connection to PEP 300. This secondary connection is taggedto indicate that it should be made a part of the original bundle(possibly the original request contained a tag that is reflected back).The tagging may be in the form of a TCP or IP option. After thesecondary connection is established, it is made part of the connectionbundle, enhancing performance.

If the sending PEP (i.e., the PEP desiring to increase the number ofconnections in the bundle) can directly address the receiving PEP (e.g.,there is no NAT-like device in the path), then the sending PEP can openthe correction directly using a normal TCP SYN packet, tagged toindicate to the receiver that this new connection is a secondaryconnection associated with the original bundle. Additional performanceoptimization can be made in this case by combining data to be sent withthe opening SYN packet. This is expressly allowed by the TCP standardbut is not commonly used due to limitations in the applications programinterface (API) used in most operating systems (i.e., BSD sockets). Ifdata to be sent is combined with the SYN that initiates the secondaryconnection then the total number of packets in the network is identicalbetween the two methods. The primary difference is that the nodes alongthe path between the two PEPS either see one or multiple connections.

Advantageously, upon establishment of a parallel connection within abundle, the congestion avoidance algorithm parameters for the newconnection may be based on the other members of the bundle, avoiding thestandard TCP slow-start behavior which is used to determine networkconditions. For example, when the second connection of a bundle isopened, the sender can simply transfer half of the cwnd and ssthreshcontrol variables of the primary connection to the second connection andallow the second connection to skip the slow-start phase and movedirectly into the congestion avoidance phase (alternate congestionavoidance algorithms would use different, but analogous, variables). Oneimplementation difficulty of this choice is the lack of a TCP self-clockdue to the absence of ACKs having been established by the secondconnection. However, the second connection could share the ACKs of otherconnections within the connection bundle itself Alternately, the secondconnection could utilize a rate-based sending scheme until the TCP ACKself-clock is established. This is particularly effective since theround trip time of the second connection is already well established,allowing a rate-based sending scheme to spread the inter-packet delayevenly.

When the number of connections needs to be reduced, the sender maysimply close a secondary connection by sending a FIN on that secondaryconnection. A FIN on the primary connection may be considered ashorthand to close all of the connections. Unlike the connection openscenario, there are no visibility problems created by NAT-like devices,as communications have already been established. Further, since it is alikely case that the number of parallel connections will vary over time(especially for long-lived connections), the system may optimize thecreation of a secondary connection near in time to the destruction of asecondary connection by reusing the same port numbers so that the TCPcontrol block associated with them can be reused (remember, TCP controlblocks must remain active for up to two minutes after a connection isclosed due to IP packet duplication, loss and delayed delivery issues).

When the PEP creates additional real connections, there are issuesassociated with how it is addressed. If the initiating PEP is known tohave an independent IP address that is visible to the responding PEP(this information may be exchanged during the open of the originalconnection when the PEPS identify each other's presence), then thesecondary connections can utilize the IP address and port numbersassociated with the originating PEP. Otherwise, the originating PEP mustutilize the IP address of the original initiating system. This may forcethe PEP to pick a port number that is not currently in use by theoriginating system (for example, by tracking all connections opened bythe originating system that transit the PEP whether to PEP enableddestinations or not) for the new secondary connection. Future activityby the originating system may cause it to choose as a port number thesame port number chosen by the PEP. In this case, the PEP detects theport number collision and translates it into an unused port number(again, this is done independently of whether the connection is toanother PEP or not). Alternately, the PEP might choose to close thepreviously established secondary connection, allowing the new connection(that reuses the same port number) to proceed without port numbertranslation. The closed secondary connection could be reestablished on adifferent, currently unused port number. As an optimization, a specialoption could be sent that directly transfers the second connection to anunused port (i.e., combines the close and subsequent open into a singlemessage).

In the alternate embodiment with real connections, data ordering is anissue. The receiving PEP must be able to order the data received fromthe multiple parallel connections into a single stream of data. Onemethod is for a TCP or IP option to be appended to each packet toindicate the ordering of the data between the multiple streams.Preferentially, this option contains either a starting sequence numberand size or two sequence numbers (starting and ending). A singlesequence number is insufficient as TCP packets can be fractured into twoTCP packets legally by transiting nodes. By including the second number(i.e., size or ending sequence number) the receiving PEP is able todetect and handle this situation. Another method is to multiplex basedon data index and an arbitrary data size. For example, if the data sizeis “M” and there are “N” parallel connections, then bytes [0 . . . M*N)of the original stream could be multiplexed as follows. M bytes ofconnection 0 could be bytes [0 . . . M) and M Bytes of connection 1could be bytes [M . . . 2*M), etc. Other multiplexing schemes could beused, including placing additional demultiplexing information directlyin the TCP payload itself.

In the preferred embodiment where the multiple connections are virtual,there are two implementation options: separate or combined bookkeeping.In the combined bookkeeping case, a single congestion window is computedfor the overall aggregate connection. The referenced paper,“Differentiated End-to-End Internet Services using a WeightedProportional Fair Sharing TCP” by John Crowcroft and Philippe Oechslin,contains one implementation method for this situation. In the separatebookkeeping case, a separate congestion window (and slow-startthreshold) is maintained for each virtual connection. Individual packetsare assigned to virtual connections with each virtual connectionfollowing the standard TCP operation rules. Assignment of packets tovirtual connections can be done in many algorithms, including roundrobin, statistical, and first available. In the preferred embodiment,assignment of packets is deferred until one of the connections hassufficient congestion window to enable transmission of the packet. Thuspackets are transmitted whenever any of the virtual connections hasavailable bandwidth.

In cases of extreme congestion, enough packets can be lost to trigger atimeout (RTO) on one of the connections within a bundle. Under standardTCP congestion avoidance behavior, this causes a return to a cwnd of onepacket and an initiation of slow-start behavior. The PEP may optionallyapply this behavior to all connections within a bundle if any of themexperiences an RTO. Alternately, the PEP may apply this behavior to onlythe individual connection that suffered the RTO. Alternately, the PEPmay choose to reduce “N” to one before beginning the RTO recoveryprocedure.

The congestion avoidance algorithms described above use differentmethods to retain differing degrees of fairness in the allocation ofnetwork bandwidth while overcoming protocol limitations. However, whilethis is similar to the behavior of standard TCP implementations, it isnot always the desired result. In many situations, unfair allocation ofnetwork resources is desired. Existing allocation algorithms(generically referred to as “Quality of Service” or QoS algorithms)often fail due to design or deployment deficiencies, resulting ininsufficient performance for critical applications. In particular, thereare no reliable QoS capabilities for the public Internet. Indeed, mostprivate IP networks also fail to implement any usable form of QoS.

The least fair algorithm is to send the data at a constant rateregardless of network conditions. For some applications, thisapproximates the best behavior. In the presence of congestion, thisalgorithm would not reduce its rate, causing it to maximally benefitfrom the reduction in sending rates of the competing connections. In apreferred embodiment, one congestion avoidance algorithm is to seek aspecified loss rate within a fixed minimum and maximum bandwidths.Periodically, the packet loss rate is measured and compared to thespecified loss rate, if the measured loss rate is below the optimaltarget and the current sending rate is below the specified maximum thenthe sending rate is increased. If the measured loss rate is above thetarget and the current sending rate is above the minimum then thesending rate is reduced.

In a preferred embodiment, the selection of the congestion avoidancealgorithm as well as the particular algorithms parameters is specifiedby operations personnel, considering criteria such as date, time of day,originating system, terminating system, protocol type and others.

Some congestion avoidance algorithms use estimates of the availablebandwidth for a connection. Many techniques are known, an example ofwhich is described in the paper “ABwE: A Practical Approach to AvailableBandwidth Estimation,” by Jiri Navratil and R. Les. Cottrell. This paperdescribes a method of estimating the available bandwidth on a connectionusing the dispersion of pairs of packets that where known to be sentadjacent to each other by the sender. One limitation of the mechanismdescribed by the paper is that it periodically injects extra packetsinto the network, reducing network performance accordingly. In order toavoid this extra loading, the paper suggests operating intermittently.

In an alternate embodiment, a PEP may use the packet dispersiontechnique to estimate available bandwidth on a link. Rather thaninjecting additional packets (as taught by the referenced paper), thePEP simply marks each packet that is bound for the same destination asthe previous packet when they are sent adjacent. The receiver uses thismarking to compute the estimated available bandwidth and sends thisinformation back to the sender (typically with a TCP option).

Local Retransmission

Another reason for implementing preacks is to prepare to transit ahigh-loss link (e.g., wireless). In these cases, the preacking PEP(i.e., the enhanced PEP or flow control module) is located mostbeneficially “before” the wireless link. This allows retransmissions tobe performed closer to the wireless link, removing the retransmissionburden from the remainder of the network.

FIG. 8 a depicts a common network configuration utilizing one wirelesslink. Computer 800 is connected to routing and switching infrastructure810. One node of infrastructure 810 is wireless transceiver 830, whichcommunicates with wireless transceiver 840, which is connected tocomputer 850. Packets from computer 800 destined for computer 850 areforwarded, by infrastructure 810, to transceiver 830. Transceiver 830broadcasts the packets, which are received by transceiver 840, whichsends them to computer 850. Packets from computer 850 to computer 800travel the reverse route. If a packet is corrupted during the wirelesstransmission and reception phase, it is dropped by transceiver 840.Computer 800 will detect the loss of the packet using any of thestandard TCP techniques for detecting dropped packets (dupacks andselective acknowledgements), and will retransmit accordingly. FIG. 8 bshows the system of FIG. 8 a augmented with PEP 820. Packets sentbetween transceiver 830 and infrastructure 810 transit the PEP and maybe modified according to any PEP algorithms that are enabled.

PEP 820 may provide local retransmission, in which case, packets droppeddue to failures of the wireless transmission process are retransmitteddirectly by PEP 820. This is advantageous because it eliminates theretransmission burden upon computer 800 and infrastructure 810. Further,it is often the case that the bandwidth of the wireless segment exceedsthat of the slowest link within infrastructure 810. Without the PEP, thedropped packet would have to be retransmitted by computer 800, whichwould, according to standard TCP/IP congestion avoidance algorithms,reduce its bandwidth by one-half, resulting in poor overall transmissionrates. With PEP 820 providing local retransmissions, the dropped packetcan be ‘retransmitted across the wireless link without necessitating aretransmit by computer 800 and a corresponding decrease in the rate ofdata transmission from computer 800 (since, in this case, the wirelesslink has greater bandwidth than the current transmission rate—likely thebandwidth differential is sufficient to retransmit the packet severaltimes without requiring a pause in data transmission from the source).

Another reason for implementing preacks is to avoid the RTO penalty. Instandard TCP there are many situations that result in an RTO, eventhough a large percentage of the packets in flight were successfullyreceived. With standard TCP algorithms, dropping more than one packetwithin an RTT window would likely result in a timeout. Additionally,most TCPs experience a timeout if a retransmitted packet is dropped. Ina network with a high bandwidth delay product, even a relatively smallpacket loss rate will cause frequent RTOs.

This RTO behavior is particularly painful with TCP SACK as the RTOrequires packets that are known to have been received by the receiver(i.e., SACKed) to be retransmitted. This requirement is present to avoida relatively rare memory deadlock situation at the receiver. (e.g., areceiver may be forced to drop previously SACKed packets in order tocreate sufficient room to receive packets that are actually in order,essentially reneging on the previous acknowledgement). In standard TCP,retransmission of packets is induced either by reception of a fixednumber of duplicate ACKs (dupacks), typically three, or by examiningSACK information and inferring a packet loss (i.e., forwardacknowledgements—see RFC 2760 and others). The PEP may also use othercriteria, such as direct RTT based evidence (i.e., noticing the lack ofan acknowledgement after one RTT has elapsed—naturally, this must takeinto account the Nagle delayed ACK behavior, if present).

An alternate retransmit and timeout algorithm is used by the PEP toavoid prematurely RTOing. A count of retransmissions is maintained on aper-packet basis. Each time that a packet is retransmitted, the count isincremented by one and the PEP continues to transmit packets (within thecurrent bandwidth and window constraints). Any of the retransmissionindicators described above can be used to stimulate the PEP into aretransmission. Only if a packet has been retransmitted a certain numberof times is an RTO declared. This mechanism avoids declaring a prematureRTO yet still successfully recovers in the rare situation when thereceiver must renege on a previous SACK.

As described above, the standard TCP retransmit algorithms functionpoorly in the face of multiple packet losses within an RTT window.Depending on the congestion avoidance algorithm selected, the PEP may becalled upon to operate in an environment where substantial packet lossis expected. In order to achieve acceptable performance, the retransmitalgorithms of the PEP must handle this situation effectively withoutresorting to RTOs except in extremely rare conditions. The algorithmspreferably are robust in the face of both intermittent and burst packetlosses of both transmitted data and acknowledgements. The presence ofpacket reordering further complicates these algorithms and thedescription thereof. Consequently, the algorithms will be described asthough reordering were not a consideration, and then their descriptionwill be enhanced to address reordering issues.

Wavefront Detection and Disambiguation of Acknowledgements

The paper, “Forward Acknowledgment: Refining TCP Congestion Control,” byMatthew Mathis and Jamshid Mandavi, describes an extension of thestandard TCP mechanisms for determining that retransmitted packets havebeen lost. The mechanism operates by retaining the highest sequencenumber known to be held by the receiver (called snd.fack in the paper)and labeling each retransmitted packet with the current value of snd.nxt(the highest sequence number ever sent). When the sender receives an ACKor a SACK that updates snd.fack beyond the value of snd.nxt associatedwith a retransmitted packet, the sender assumes that the retransmittedpacket has been lost.

One deficiency in this mechanism is that it relies on the introductionof new data to detect the loss of retransmitted data. Without theintroduction of new data, snd.nxt is not advanced, thereby crippling themechanism. There can be many reasons for the inability to introduce newdata, including: exhaustion of the receiver's advertised window,exhaustion of the sender's window, and the end of new application data(i.e., the end of a transaction). Many network applications aretransactional in nature; they send some data and wait for a responsefrom their communicant. If the size of an application transaction isless than the bandwidth delay product of the network, this mechanismoften fails to detect that retransmitted packets have been lost.

To address this deficiency, in one embodiment of a system and process inaccordance with the present invention, a sender makes decisions aboutwhether data packets have been lost by determining which data packet inthe wavefront of transmitted data packets caused an acknowledgement tobe generated. When the sender receives an acknowledgement for a datapacket, the sender presumes loss of any data packet that was transmittedbefore the acknowledged data packet but has not yet been acknowledged.This is based on the observation that acknowledgements for packets tendto arrive in the same order the packets were originally transmitted. Butan ambiguity arises when a retransmitted packet is acknowledged. In sucha case, the receiver does not know which transmission of the data packet(i.e., which instance of the acknowledged data packet) in the wavefrontof transmitted data packets caused the acknowledgement to be generated.This ambiguity is illustrated in the example of FIG. 24.

FIG. 24 illustrates an example of a series of data packets transmittedfrom a sender to a receiver over a network. Each data packet is labeledwith its sequence number, which shows the identity of the datatransmitted in the packet. In this example, the data packet having asequence number of 1 is transmitted three times, ostensibly because thefirst two instances of its transmission are lost or otherwise notdelivered to the receiver within sufficient time (indicated in thefigure by the crossing out of the first two instances). When thereceiver does receive a data packet having a sequence number of 1 (here,the third instance), the receiver generates and transmits anacknowledgement for that data packet back to the sender. From the pointof view of the sender, however, it is ambiguous whether thatacknowledgement was in response to the first, second, or third instanceof the data packet's arriving. If the sender knows the real answer tothis question—here, that the third instance is the one that wasreceived—the sender will know that it is likely that earlier transmittedpackets (e.g., sequence numbers 5, 4, 3, 2, and 0) are lost unless theyhave already been acknowledged.

Accordingly, the sender retransmits data packets to a receiver based ona perceived, need to retransmit the packets by identifying the datapacket in the wavefront of transmitted data packets that caused anacknowledgement to be generated. FIG. 25 illustrates a flow diagram ofone embodiment of a method for determining whether particular datapackets need to be retransmitted. As FIG. 25 illustrates, a sendertransmits 2510 data packets over a network, where each instance of atransmitted data packet is associated with a transmit number. It can beappreciated that the transmit number for a packet is not the same as thepacket's sequence number, since a sequence number references the data inthe packet while the transmit number references an instance of atransmission of that data. The transmit number can be any informationusable for this purpose, including a timestamp associated with a packetor simply an increasing number (similar to a sequence number or a packetnumber). Because a data segment may be retransmitted, different transmitnumbers may be associated with a particular sequence number.

As the sender transmits 2510 data packets, the sender maintains 2520 adata structure of acknowledged instances of data packet transmissions.Each instance of a data packet transmission is referenced by itssequence number and transmit number, as shown in FIG. 24. By maintaininga transmit number for each packet, the sender retains the ordering ofthe transmission of data packets. When the sender receives 2530 an ACKor a SACK, the sender determines 2550 the highest transmit numberassociated with packets that the receiver indicated have arrived (in thereceived acknowledgement). Any outstanding unacknowledged packets withlower transmit numbers are presumed 2560 lost. In the cases where theACK or SACK indicates the arrival of a packet that has never beenretransmitted, this algorithm yields results substantially similar tothe Mathis mechanism described above.

As mentioned above, however, the sender is presented with an ambiguoussituation when the arriving packet has been retransmitted: The standardACK/SACK does not contain enough information to allow the sender todetermine which transmission of the arriving packet has triggered theacknowledgement. After receiving 2530 an ambiguous acknowledgement,therefore, the sender disambiguates 2540 the acknowledgement toassociate it with a transmit number. This is needed before steps 2550and 2560 because standard acknowledgements contain only the sequencenumber, not a transmit number. In various embodiments, one or acombination of several techniques may be used to resolve this ambiguity.

In one embodiment, the sender includes an identifier with a transmitteddata packet, arid the receiver returns that identifier or a functionthereof with the acknowledgement. The identifier may be a timestamp(e.g., a TCP timestamp as described in RFC 1323), a sequential number,or any other information that can be used to resolve between two or moreinstances of a packet's transmission. In an embodiment in which the TCPtimestamp option is used to disambiguate the acknowledgement, eachpacket is tagged with up to 32-bits of unique information. Upon receiptof the data packet, the receiver echoes this unique information back tothe sender with the acknowledgement. The sender ensures that theoriginally sent packet and its retransmitted version or versions containdifferent values for the timestamp option, allowing it to unambiguouslyeliminate the ACK ambiguity. The sender may maintain this uniqueinformation, for example, in the data structure in which it stores thestatus of sent data packets. This technique is advantageous because itcomplies with industry standards and is thus likely ‘to encounter littleor no interoperability issues. However, this technique may require tenbytes of TCP header space in some implementations, reducing theeffective throughput rate on the network and reducing space availablefor other TCP options.

In another embodiment, another field in the packet, such as the IP IDfield, is used to disambiguate in a way similar to the TCP timestampoption described above. The sender arranges for the ID field values ofthe original and the retransmitted version or versions of the packet tohave different ID fields in the IP header. Upon reception of the datapacket at the receiver, or a proxy device thereof, the receiver sets theID field of the ACK packet to a function of the ID field of the packetthat triggers the ACK. This method is advantageous, as it requires noadditional data to be sent, preserving the efficiency of the network andTCP header space. The function chosen should provide a high degree oflikelihood of providing disambiguation. In a preferred embodiment, thesender selects IP ID values with the most significant bit set to 0. Whenthe receiver responds, the IP ID value is set to the same IP ID valuewith the most significant bit set to a one. Two potential difficultiesmay arise with this method.

One difficulty is that the technique may fail or be unusable when datatransmission is bi-directional, as the ID field may be oversubscribed(since the receiver is also a sender, the value that the receive pathneeds to reflect may overlap with one of the values disallowed by thesend path). Even if bi-directionally compatible values can be achieved,there is another danger if the packets were to be IP fragmented, sincethe IP fragmentation reassembly algorithm might fail due to thepotentially non-dense selection of the ID field values. The IPfragmentation hazard only occurs when the packet is larger than theminimum MTU size of 576 bytes. For unidirectional data transfer, theACK-only packets are always smaller than 576 and therefore will never befragmented, so this would not be an issue.

Another potential difficulty is that the identity of the ID field mightnot be preserved by intermediate processing equipment. In particular,intermediate equipment that repacketizes the data stream might alter theID field. The sender monitors the reflected IP ID fields in the ACK-onlypackets, when it detects inconsistent values (e.g., values that areknown not to be “in flight”) it disables this method.

When data transmission is bi-directional and the packet size is greaterthan 576 bytes, two variations of the second technique may be employed.In a first variation, the ID field retains its traditional definitionand the sender is left with the inability to disambiguate for theseparticular packets. In a second variation, the ID field retains itstraditional definition and the TCP timestamp option is added tobi-directional packets to disambiguate. As with all usages of the TCPtimestamp option, the sender of the first timestamp has the issue ofwhat value to place in the echo half of the option—since the sender hasnot yet received one. In this variation, the incoming ID field is usedas the echo value, allowing the original sender, which was notexperiencing bi-directional data, to disambiguate.

In another embodiment, the transmit numbers associated withnon-ambiguous acknowledgements are used to disambiguate an ambiguousacknowledgement. This technique is based on the principle thatacknowledgements for two packets will tend to be received closer in timeas the packets are transmitted closer in time. Packets that are notretransmitted will not result in ambiguity, as the acknowledgementsreceived for such packets can be readily associated with a transmitnumber. Therefore, these known transmit numbers are compared to thepossible transmit numbers for an ambiguous acknowledgement received nearin time to the known acknowledgement. The sender compares the transmitnumbers of the ambiguous acknowledgement against the last known receivedtransmit number, selecting the one closest to the known receivedtransmit number. In FIG. 24, for example, if an acknowledgement for datapacket 1 is received and the last received acknowledgement was for datapacket 5, the sender resolves the ambiguity by assuming that the thirdinstance of data packet 1 caused the acknowledgement. Advantageously,this method requires no nonstandard actions on the part of the receivingequipment.

TCP Selection Acknowledgements

The techniques described above can provide robust behavior in thepresence of very high loss rates for the transmitted data packets andmodest loss rates for the acknowledge packets. Nevertheless, large burstlosses of ACK packets will sometimes degrade these techniques, causingthem needlessly to retransmit data that was actually received. This canoccur when a receiver implements the SACK algorithm according to therecommendations in RFC 2018. The TCP header has room for up to four SACKranges. The RFC requires that the first SACK range include the landingpacket that triggered this SACK packet, and any additional ranges, up tothe capacity of the SACK packet, are to be presented in most recenttemporal order. This ordering guarantees that any landing packet will bedocumented in at least three consecutive SACK packets. However, thisalgorithm may result in poor performance in high packet lossenvironments because it confines the knowledge of the receipt of apacket to temporally adjacent SACK packets—all of which may be droppedin a burst loss situation. When using this algorithm, while the senderis able to determine that some packets have been received; it cannotnecessarily determine which packets have been lost due to thepossibility of dropped SACK packets.

These deficiencies can be addressed by adding functionality to thesender and to the receiver in accordance with the present invention.This additional functionality allows the sender to determineunambiguously a list of packets that have been received by the receiveras well as an accurate list of packets not received—even in the presenceof high SACK packet losses. The added functionality may be implementedby modifying the sender and/or receiver, or by inserting sender- andreceiver-side flow control modules (or PEPS, such as those describedherein) in the network path between the sender and receiver.Accordingly, any functionalities attributed to the sender or receiverhere could be implemented by a flow control module, acting as a proxydevice for the sender or receiver, coupled to the sender or receiver inthe network connection therebetween. FIG. 26 illustrates one embodimentof a system for transmitting and acknowledging data packets, inaccordance with an embodiment of the invention.

As FIG. 26 illustrates, a sender 2610 is communicatively coupled to areceiver 26 15 over a network 2620. The sender 2610 is configured totransmit data packets to the receiver 261 5 over the network 2620, inresponse to which the receiver 261 5 returns a SACK packet to the sender2610. In a typical embodiment, the communication is bi-directional,although only one direction of communication is discussed here forsimplicity. The receiver 261 5 maintains a list 2625, or otherappropriate data structure, that contains a group of ranges of sequencenumbers for data packets that the receiver 261 5 has actually received.Preferably, the list 2625 ‘is sorted by sequence number in an ascendingor descending order. The receiver 261 5 also maintains a left-offpointer 2630, which comprises a reference into the list 2625 andindicate the left-off point from the previously generated SACK packet.

Upon reception of a data packet, the receiver 261 5 generates andtransmits a SACK packet back to the sender 2610. As described above, theSACK packet includes a number of fields, each of which can hold a rangeof sequence numbers to indicate a set of received data packets.Completing the first field of the SACK information per the RFC, thereceiver 261 5 fills this first field with a range of sequence numbersthat includes the landing packet that triggered the SACK packet. (It isnoted that this is compatible with RFC 2581.) In the example shown inFIG. 26, this first range is 19-19, since the data packet having asequence number of 19 triggered the SACK packet. The remaining availableSACK fields are filled with ranges of sequence numbers from the list2625 of received packets. As there are more ranges in the list 2625 thancan be loaded into the SACK packet, the receiver 2615 uses the left-offpointer 2630 to determine which ranges are loaded into the SACK packet.The receiver 261 5 inserts the SACK ranges consecutively from the sortedlist 2625, starting from the range referenced by the pointer 2630 andcontinuing down the list 2625 until the available SACK range space inthe TCP header of the SACK packet is consumed. The receiver 2630 wrapsaround to the start of the list 2625 if it reaches the end. Typically,two or three additional SACK ranges can be added to the SACK rangeinformation. Continuing the example of FIG. 26, the remaining threerange fields are loaded with the ranges: 4-5 (the range referenced bythe pointer 2630), 7-9, and 11-12.

Once the receiver 261 5 generated the SACK packet, it sends theacknowledgement back to the sender 2610. The receiver 2615 then advancesthe left-off pointer 2630 by one or more SACK range entries in the list2625. If the receiver 261 5 inserts four SACK ranges, for example, theleft-off pointer 2630 may be advanced two SACK ranges in the list 2625.When the advanced left-off pointer 2630 reaches at the end of the list,the pointer 2630 is reset to the start of the list 2625, effectivelywrapping around the list 2625 of known received ranges. Wrapping aroundthe list 2625 enables the system to perform well, even in the presenceof large losses of SACK packets, since the SACK information that is notcommunicated due to a lost SACK packet will eventually be communicatedonce the list 2625 is wrapped around.

The example of FIG. 26 illustrates how this scheme communicates whichpackets have been received as well as which packets have not beenreceived. In the example, the receiver's SACK-range list 2625 includesthe ranges: 1-2, 4-5, 7-9, 11-12, 14-15 and 17-17. Because the list 2625is sorted, these ranges imply that the receiver 2615 has not receivedthe packets 3, 6, 10, 13, and 16. In the example, further, the left-offpointer 2630 references the range 4-5 in the list 2625. As the arrivingpacket from the sender 2610 contains the data with sequence number 19,the receiver 2615 responds with a SACK packet containing 19-19 in thefirst range and 4-5, 7-9, and 11-12 in the following three ranges. Theleft-off pointer 2630 is then advanced to reference entry 7-9 of thelist 2625 (or, optionally, to reference entry 11-12). Upon receivingthis SACK information, the sender 26 10 knows unambiguously that whenthe packet containing 19 landed at the receiver, the receiver not onlypossessed the data explicitly included in the SACK ranges (4, 5, 7, 8,9, 11, 12, and 19 in the example), but that the receiver had notreceived data packets for the data between the provided ranges (6 and 10in the example). In this example, the sender could be confidant that itshould retransmit 6 and 10, assuming that it had not alreadyretransmitted 6 or 10 after the transmission of 19. Continuing theexample, if the next packet received by the sender were packet 20, thesender would return a SACK packet with the ranges 19-20, 7-9, 11-12, and14-15. Again, this SACK packet would communicate to the sender that thereceiver did not have packets 10 or 13 at the time it received the, datawith sequence number 20.

It can be appreciated, therefore, that the SACK packet described hereinmay communicate several details about the condition of the receiver2615. First, the SACK packet indicates that, upon generation of theSACK-packet, the receiver 2615 had just received a data packet that iswithin the first field of the SACK information. Secondly, the second andsubsequent fields of the SACK information indicate that the receiver2615 has received the data packets within those ranges. And finally, theSACK information implies that the receiver 2615 had not, at the time ofthe SACK packet's generation, received any of the data packets that fallbetween the second and subsequent fields of the SACK information. Inessence, the ranges between the second and subsequent ranges in the SACKinformation are “holes” in the received data, the data therein known notto have been delivered. Using this method, therefore, when a SACK packethas sufficient space to include more than two SACK ranges, the receiver2615 may indicate to the sender 2610 a range of data packets that havenot yet been received by the receiver 2615. It is noted that nothing isnecessarily known about the data packets with sequence numbers that fallbetween the first and second ranges in the SACK packet, as these rangesare usually not consecutive.

In another embodiment, the sender 2610 uses the SACK packet describedabove in combination with the retransmit algorithm, described in theprevious section, to make assumptions about which data packets have beendelivered to the receiver 2615. For example, when the retransmitalgorithm (using the transmit numbers) declares a packet lost, thesender 2610 considers the packet to be only conditionally lost, as it ispossible that the SACK packet identifying the reception of this packetwas lost rather than the data packet itself. The sender 2610 thus addsthis packet to a list of potentially lost packets, called the presumedlost list. Each time a SACK packet arrives, the known missing ranges ofdata from the SACK packet (as described above) are compared to thepackets in the presumed lost list. Packets that contain data known to bemissing are declared actually lost and are subsequently retransmitted.In this way, the two schemes are combined to give the sender 2610 betterinformation about which packets have been lost and need to beretransmitted.

In one embodiment, sender 2610 continually monitors the returned SACKranges, looking for inconsistent behavior. Behavior that is inconsistentwith this technique indicates to the sender 2610 that the receiver 2615is not following the scheme. One method of detecting inconsistentbehavior is to notice that SACK ranges after the first range are notprovided in a sorted sequence number order. If inconsistent behavior isdetected, the sender 2610 cannot make valid assumptions in accordancewith this scheme, so the functionality is suppressed in the sender 2610as well.

As stated earlier, the above description does not discuss packetreordering. In the presence of packet reordering, the scheme describedabove may prematurely determine that a packet has been lost andretransmit it, only to subsequently discover that the packet wasreceived out of order and therefore the retransmission was unnecessary.To address this problem, in one embodiment, packets are not removed fromthe presumed lost list and retransmitted until a minimum number ofadditional acknowledgements (called dupthresh) have arrived. The valuefor dupthresh can be set in accordance with the amount of packetreordering present or expected. Several methods of determining the valueof dupthresh are known, a discussion of which is contained in the paper,“RR-TCP: A Reordering-Robust TCP with DSACK,” by Ming Zhang, Brad Karp,Sally Floyd, and Larry Peterson.

Transaction Boundary Detection

One class of optimizations pertains to ping-pong behaved connections. Atthe TCP layer, ping-pong behavior is when one communicant sends data andthen waits for a response from the other communicant. Examples ofping-pong behavior include remote procedure call, HTTP and others. Thealgorithms described above use retransmission timeout (RTO) to recoverfrom the dropping of the last packet or packets associated with thetransaction. Since the TCP RTO mechanism is extremely coarse (requiringa minimum one second value in all cases), poor application behavior isseen in these situations.

To address this problem, in one embodiment, the sender of data or a flowcontrol module coupled to the sender detects a transaction boundary inthe data being sent. Upon detecting a transaction boundary, the senderor a flow control module sends additional packets, whose receptiongenerates additional ACK or SACK responses from the receiver. Insertionof the additional packets is preferably limited to balance betweenimproved application response time and network capacity utilization. Thenumber of additional packets that is inserted may be selected accordingto the current loss rate associated with that connection, with morepackets selected for connections having a higher loss rate. In oneexample, the method is performed in a flow control module, such as inthe PEP 200 in a network topology like that shown in FIG. 2.

One method of detecting a transaction boundary is time based. If thesender has been sending data and ceases, then after a period of time thesender or flow control module declares a transaction boundary. This maybe combined with other techniques. For example, as is known, the settingof the PSH bit by the sender in the TCP header is a potential indicationof a transaction boundary. Accordingly, combining the time-basedapproach with these additional heuristics can provide for more accuratedetection of a transaction boundary. In another technique, if the senderor flow control module understands the application protocol, it canparse the protocol data stream and directly determine transactionboundaries. This last behavior can be used independent of any time-basedmechanism.

Responsive to detecting a transaction boundary, the sender'or flowcontrol module transmits additional data packets to the receiver tocause acknowledgements therefrom. The additional data packets shouldtherefore be such that the receiver will at least generate an ACK orSACK in response to receiving the data packet. In one embodiment, thelast packet or packets of the transaction are simply retransmitted. Thishas the added benefit of retransmitting needed data if the last packetor packets had been dropped, as compared to merely sending dummy datapackets. In another embodiment, fractions of the last packet or packetsare sent, allowing the sender to disambiguate the arrival of thesepackets from their original packets. This allows the receiver to avoidfalsely confusing any reordering adaptation algorithms. In anotherembodiment, any of a number of well-known forward error correctiontechniques can be used to generate additional data for the insertedpackets, allowing for the reconstruction of dropped or otherwise missingdata at the receiver.

Accordingly, this technique helps to avoid a timeout when theacknowledgements for the last data packets in a transaction are dropped.When the sender or flow control module receives the acknowledgements forthese additional data packets, it can be determined from theseadditional acknowledgements whether the last data packets have beenreceived or need to be retransmitted, thus avoiding a timeout. In oneembodiment, if the last packets have been received but theiracknowledgements were dropped, a flow control module generates anacknowledgement for the data packets and sends the acknowledgement tothe sender, thus communicating to the sender that the data packets havebeen delivered. In another embodiment, if the last packets have not beenreceived, a flow control module sends a packet to the sender to causethe sender to retransmit the dropped data packets. This can beaccomplished according to any of a number of techniques, such as themethods described in previous sections herein.

Repacketization

As described above, TCP performance is proportional to packet size. Thusincreasing packet sizes improves performance unless it causessubstantially increased packet loss rates or other nonlinear effects,like IP fragmentation. In general, wired media (such as copper or fibreoptics) have extremely low bit-error rates, low enough that these can beignored. For these media, it is advantageous for the packet size to bethe maximum possible before fragmentation occurs (the maximum packetsize is limited by the protocols of the underlying transmission media).Whereas for transmission media with higher loss rates (e.g., wirelesstechnologies such as WiFi, etc., or high-loss environments such aspower-line networking, etc.), increasing the packet size may lead tolower transmission rates, as media-induced errors cause an entire packetto be dropped (i.e., media-induced errors beyond the capability of thestandard error correcting code for that media), increasing the packetloss rate. A sufficiently large increase in the packet loss rate willactually negate any performance benefit of increasing packet size.

It is difficult for a TCP endpoint to choose an optimal packet size.Indeed, the optimal packet size may vary across the transmission path,depending on the nature of each link. By inserting an enhanced (or flowcontrol module) PEP into the transmission path, this situation can beimproved. Again, the enhanced PEP may simply be referenced as a PEP forease of discussion in this section. An intermediate PEP can repacketizedata, (i.e., combine packets with sequential data into a smaller numberof larger packets or break apart a sequence of large packets into alarger number of smaller packets). A PEP can monitor the linkcharacteristics and adjust the transiting packet sizes throughrecombination to improve throughput.

A choice facing the PEP designer, when repacketizing, is how to handleACKs to the sending TCP endpoint. One strategy is to do nothing (i.e.,let the destination TCP endpoint generate ACKs—as it does normally—andallow these ACKs to propagate back to the originating TCP endpoint).This method's advantage is that there is no requirement that the ACKs berouted through the PEP. Hence, this option works regardless of theoverall network topology (i.e., unrestricted). However, this method hasother disadvantages. One disadvantage is that the sending TCP endpointwill be receiving ACKs for sequence numbers different than those thatwere sent. Although permitted by the TCP specification, this situationis unusual, increasing the risk that some TCP implementations willmalfunction. Another disadvantage is that when a packet is dropped, thesending TCP may incorrectly recognize which packets requireretransmission, ultimately requiring a timeout to regain synchronizationand causing needless performance loss.

Another PEP implementation choice is to require full-duplexcommunications. In this case, the PEP can alter the returning ACKs andadjust the sequence numbers to match the original sending sequence. Thisrequires the PEP to reproduce the original sequence number\stream. Onemethod of reproduction is to store the original sequence numbersequence.

Saving only the original sequence number stream limits the performancegain that a PEP can achieve. Since the original data is not saved, onlythe TCP endpoint can retransmit any dropped data. But theretransmissions are performed only on the boundaries of the originalpackets, wasting network bandwidth due to the misalignment of theoriginal and repacketized streams.

Another implementation choice is to save the original data stream. Thischoice allows increased efficiency in the handling of dropped packets asthe PEP can supply the missing data exactly. Further optimization occursbecause the retransmitted data does not consume bandwidth on the networklinks between the sending TCP endpoint and the PEP. Note that this isvery similar to a preack situation. If the PEP implements preacks, thenrepacketization is easy to add.

Repacketization is beneficial for connections that move large amounts ofdata. However, it is injurious to connections that are latency sensitive(e.g., TELNET and others), as the PEP may wait for additional packetsfrom the sender to constitute a full MTU packet, increasing the latencyfor transmission.

Dual PEP Algorithms

Another class of enhanced PEP algorithms in accordance with the presentinvention is known as dual-PEP algorithms. Again, for ease ofdiscussion, enhanced PEPs (flow control modules) are referenced as PEPsin this and subsequent sections. Dual-PEP algorithms require thepresence of two PEPs in the conversation. Typically, a dual-PEPalgorithm is also a full-duplex PEP algorithm. A dual-PEP algorithm,similar to a VPN, operates by transforming the packets sent by a senderinto another format. This intermediate packet format is sent from onePEP to the other PEP. The receiving PEP transforms the packet back intoa format comprehensible to the receiver before forwarding it. Packettransformations are not limited to modifications of the payload.Dual-PEP algorithms may augment or modify protocol control fields, aswell.

FIG. 3 depicts the addition of a second PEP 300 into the system of FIG.2. This configuration allows the use of dual-PEP algorithms incommunications between computer 100 and computer 140. In thisconfiguration, the packets that flow between PEP 200 and PEP 300 maycontain data that is not understood by either endpoint. However, throughthe use of standard TCP format packets, the transfer of these packetsbetween the two PEPs is subject to the same operations as though the twoPEPs were not present in the conversation (i.e., FIG. 1).

Compression

One example of a dual-PEP algorithm is compression, which boostsperformance by transferring less data between the two participatingPEPs. Two forms of compression are known, context-sensitive andcontext-insensitive. Context-insensitive data compression is applied todata without knowledge of the type of data. Context-sensitivecompression utilizes knowledge of the data type to select a specificcompression algorithm from a suite of suitable algorithms. In general,knowledge of the specific protocol is required to performcontext-sensitive compression. A PEP can use TCP port numbers (i.e.,well-known ports), as well as data from the connection itself todetermine the appropriate compression algorithm to use. Some protocolsuse only a single type of data, requiring only a single compressionalgorithm that can be selected when the connection is established. Otherprotocols contain different types of data at different times. Forexample, POP, IMAP, SMTP, and HTTP all move files of arbitrary typesinterspersed with other protocol data. Knowledge of the data type and,in most cases, permission from the user are required to use a lossycompression algorithm. Otherwise, only lossless compression algorithmscan be employed safely. Compression is not limited to the protocolpayload. The control fields of the protocol itself may be compressed,using a completely different algorithm than that used for the payload.

Upper-Level Protocol PEPs

Some PEP algorithms are applied specifically to the upper-level protocolof a connection. These upper-level protocol-specific PEP algorithmsanalyze the conversation, typically on a transaction-by-transactionbasis. Typical upper-level PEP algorithms include: caching,pre-fetching, post-writing, and others.

The UNIX Network File System (NFS) and The Common Internet File System(CIFS, also known as Server Message Block (SMB)) are well known fileserving network protocols that may operate on top of TCP/IP. Anupper-level PEP algorithm can apply many optimizations to TCPconnections using these protocols.

Bridging Gateway

Two PEPs can also use a non-IP network to transfer data betweenthemselves. FIG. 11 depicts the system of FIG. 3 augmented with network1 100 connected between PEPs 200 and 300. In this example, network 1 100is a connection-oriented network using technologies such as AsynchronousTransfer Mode (ATM), Frame Relay (FR) or Signaling System Seven (SS7).When PEP 200 receives packets bound for PEP 300 that it determinesshould use network 1 100, it establishes a connection to PEP 300 throughnetwork 1 100 (assuming one does not already exist that is to be reused)and sends these packets to PEP 300 through this network. Likewise, PEP300 may choose to route packets destined for PEP 200 through the sameconnection on network 1 100 or use an alternate path, like a differentconnection on network 1 100 or via a normal IP oriented connectionthrough Internet 120.

In a preferred embodiment, a TCP connection from computer 100 destinedfor computer 140 is handled as follows. The connection initiating SYNpacket is allowed to flow through Internet 120. The SYN packet is taggedto indicate the presence of PEP 200 and optionally the network 1100address of PEP 200. When PEP 300 receives the SYN packet, the tagging isstripped off before it is forwarded to computer 140. When the return SYNfrom computer 140 transits PEP 300, it is augmented with the network1100 address of PEP 300. PEP 200, upon receipt of the packet, signalsnetwork 1100 to establish a connection to PEP 300. Subsequent packetsassociated with this TCP connection are sent directly through network1100, bypassing Internet 120.

One advantage of this method is that packets sent through network 1100may utilize the benefits of the alternate network. For example, ATMnetworks offer Quality of Service (QoS) capabilities not generallyavailable in IP networks, allowing the guarantee of bandwidth to be madefor mission-critical applications.

In an alternate embodiment, the connection on network 1100 can beinitiated by PEP 300 upon receipt of the original SYN packet. In thiscase, the return SYN packet could still be returned through Internet 120or it could be returned via the connection on network 1100, in neithercase does it need to be augmented with the network 1100 address of PEP300 (though it still could be).

Two mechanisms are provided to determine whether an individualconnection should be left on Internet 120 or moved to a connection onnetwork 1100. One mechanism is direct knowledge of the connection. PEP200 (or PEP 300) consults a table upon receipt of theconnection-initiating packet. The information within the tableidentifies which network to use. The PEP uses the IP address and portinformation together with the information in the table to \ make itsdecision. Other information may also be used to influence the decision,such as time of day, network utilization levels, network congestionlevels, etc. Another mechanism is programmatic. An external agent candirectly inform a PEP that certain connections are to be placed onnetwork 1100 instead of on Internet 120.

The connection on network 1100 may be used to serve a single TCPconnection. If network 1100 provides reliable sequenced delivery ofdata, then the TCP and IP headers on each packet can be removed beforebeing sent on the network 1100 connection and no TCP acknowledgementsneed be sent (noting that acknowledgements may be sent as part of theparticular protocol on network 1100, but they are not TCPacknowledgements). Another advantage of this configuration is theelimination of the TCP congestion avoidance algorithm's interactionswith the transport algorithms of network 1100. If the connection onnetwork 1100 is used to service multiple TCP connections, then datapackets need to be tagged with a connection identifier so that thereceiving PEP can demultiplex the data stream.

In another mode, the PEP need not be driven by connection establishmentto utilize network 1100. Criteria can be established that direct a PEPto transparently move a connection currently operating over Internet 120to utilize a connection on network 1100 or the reverse. Indeed a longrunning connection could be moved between the two networks multipletimes during its lifetime. Suitable criteria may include operationalparameters such as time of day, priority of data, etc. or may includesuch information such as network loading and loss rates. When the TCPconnection is actually a connection bundle or real TCP connections, onlya subset of the connections within the bundle need be moved from onenetwork to another, thereby utilizing both networks.

ADDITIONAL EMBODIMENT

FIG. 4 shows the architecture of an additional embodiment of a PEP inaccordance with the present invention. The depicted PEP is symmetrical,in that data can flow in either direction. For a first direction of dataflow, packet interface 450 receives packets from a network and forwardsthem to endpoint 400. Endpoint 400, operating as described below,contains receive path 401, which delivers data to storage queue 490.Filter 420 removes data from storage queue 490 and processes it asdescribed below. Filter results destined for the same data flowdirection are placed into storage queue 491. Endpoint 430, containingsend path 431, removes data from storage queue 491, packetizing it fordelivery to a network via network interface 440.

Note that storage queue 490 may be required only for certainimplementations of filter 420. Some implementations of filter 420 maynot require retaining inbound data, in which case, the storage queue isunnecessary. Other implementations of filter 420 may provide storagewithin themselves, eliminating the need for the storage queue.

Similarly, for a second direction of data flow, network interface 440provides packets to endpoint 430. Receive path 432 of endpoint 430delivers data to storage queue 492. Filter 420 removes data from storagequeue 492, placing results destined for the same direction into storagequeue 493. Send path 402 of endpoint 400 removes data from storage queue493, packetizing it for delivery to a network via network interface 450.Henceforth, this description will describe data flowing in the firstdirection. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the samedescription also applies to data flowing in the second direction, usingthe inverse direction elements, as described above.

Filter 420 is able to operate on both directions of data flow seriallyand simultaneously. For example, data removed from storage queue 490 maycontain a command whose result is currently cached or can be internallygenerated. In this case, filter 420 simply inserts the result of thisoperation into storage queue 493 for transmission back to the originalrequestor, deleting the original request.

Once a connection has been established (i.e., after the specialconnection establishment processing described below), endpoint 400provides some TCP upper-level behaviors and PEP algorithms. Receive path401 is responsible for reconstructing the TCP data stream before placingit into storage queue 490. This requires that receive path 401 performpacket reordering. When out-of-order packets are received, as identifiedby their TCP sequence number, receive path 401 places them into aninternal storage area until the missing packets arrive. As packetsarrive, receive path 401 examines its internal storage area, deliveringinto storage queue 490 all of the data that has arrived in the correctorder.

Receive path 401 of endpoint 400 provides preacking; when a packetarrives an acknowledgement is generated and sent using send path 402.Standard TCP delayed ACKs are supported as well as non-delayed ACKs.Flow control of the sender is provided by controlling the contents ofthe window field on acknowledge packets. The endpoint determines thevalue to place in the window field by subtracting the amount of dataresident in this direction of the system (i.e., in storage queues 490and 491, filter 420 and endpoint 430) from its estimate of the correctwindow size. This value is clipped to the maximum value of the windowfield in the packet (i.e., if the maximum window field of the ACK packetis insufficient to represent the computed value). The correct windowsize is computed from the running estimate of the RTT or, in analternate embodiment, is simply a large constant. Optionally, the windowsize may be further limited when insufficient buffer memory isavailable. In steady state the window size is adjusted to maintain therate of data ingress equal to the rate of data egress, as defined by anybandwidth allocation policy that may be present. Thus, the PEP providesfine-grained flow control, limiting the sender's rate without droppingpackets and without forcing retransmissions.

In an alternate embodiment, flow control may be accomplished by delayingACKs as well as manipulating the window field. In this embodiment, whenreceive path 401 receives a packet that is in order the ACK response forthat packet is queued until that packet is sent by send path 43 1. If apacket is received that is out of order, then all previously queued ACKsare transmitted as well as the ACK that indicates the receipt of the outof order packet. In addition, send path 491 of endpoint 430 providesmultiple PEP algorithms for outbound data, including recongestion andrepacketization, for example, as described previously and below.

ADDITIONAL REPACKETIZATION EMBODIMENT

Repacketization is performed by extracting data from storage queue 491in full-sized packet amounts and sending those packets. When there isinsufficient data in storage queue 491 to form a full-sized packet, sendpath 431 decides either to wait for more data to arrive or to send asmall packet immediately. The send-or-wait decision involves severalcriteria. If the push flag (PSH) or urgent pointer has been set for thedata in the send queue, then it is sent immediately. If neither of theseis set, then the send path may choose to delay sending the data, optingto wait for more data to arrive in storage queue 491. If additional datahas not arrived within a short period, then the remaining data is senteven though the packet is smaller than the maximum allowed. In apreferred embodiment, the PEP monitors the average time between thearrivals of adjacent non-MTU sized packets. When the arrival time isless than a constant, repacketization is enabled. When the arrival timeis greater than a constant, repacketization is disabled. In a preferredembodiment, the constant is 0.2 seconds, approximately the same as themaximum amount of time that the PEP waits before sending a non-full MTUsized packet.

The repacketization algorithm is most effective when storage queue 491continues to receive data at a rate sufficient to allow the sending offull-sized packets. The window virtualization method of receive path 401uses the occupancy of storage queue 491 as part of the criteria forcontrolling the sending rate of the TCP sender, filling storage queue491 so as to allow maximum-sized packets to be sent by send path 431 asmuch as possible.

Path MTU Discovery

An important part of the repacketization algorithm is the handling ofpath MTU (PMTU) discovery. RFC 1191, herein included by reference,contains a description of the IETF recommended algorithm for PMTUdiscovery. The repacketization algorithm needs to know the PMTU to thereceiver. There are two methods for handling PMTU discovery within a PEPusing the standard IETF methods: piggybacked and autonomous.

In the piggybacked method, the PEP relies on the sending TCP to performPMTU discovery, observing the results and reacting accordingly. When apacket is received by receive path 401 with the “don't fragment” bit(DF) set, this flag is carried through the PEP and placed onto acorresponding packet sent by send path 43 1 (e.g., having the DF flagset on a packet temporarily inhibits the repacketization algorithm, sothat a packet larger than the current MTU can be transmitted). Thispacket will either reach the destination, in which case it represents acandidate for a new PMTU size, or an ICMP error packet will be received.Upon reception of this error packet, the PEP knows that the new proposedPMTU size is not valid for send path 43 1 and that it must retain theold PMTU size. Reception of the ICMP error message also indicates thatthe large PMTU packet was dropped, so the PEP retransmits it. Of course,normal TCP behavior will also cause this packet to be retransmitted, sospecial handling of this ICMP-induced retransmission case by the PEP isoptional. The ICMP packet is not forwarded back to the TCP sender. Byfailing to forward the ICMP packet, the TCP sender will use the new PMTUin its communications with the PEP.

This is a typical case whereby a computer on a LAN communicates withanother computer via the WAN (VPN or through a router). Often, the PMTUfor the LAN segments is larger than that for the WAN segments. Bysuppressing the PMTU error packet (ICMP), the TCP sender is allowed touse the larger packet size for this connection, achieving improvednetwork efficiencies for the LAN, TCP sender, and PEP as fewer, largerpackets are processed for the same data transfer rate.

In the autonomous method, the PEP itself initiates PMTU discovery. ThePEP creates a proposed new PMTU (larger than the current PMTU for theconnection). Transiting data is repacketized to the larger PMTU and theDF flag is set on these packets. The PEP waits for the return of an ICMPerror packet. Upon receipt of the error packet, the proposed larger PMTUis known to be invalid and a smaller value is used. If, after a suitableperiod, there is no error, then the PEP knows that the new larger PMTUis acceptable. Alternately, an ACK of the larger-sized packet signalsacceptance of the new PMTU size.

The piggyback method cannot be relied upon completely to optimize thePMTU of all paths in the connection. For example, referring to FIG. 3,assume that the PMTU of the segments comprising Internet 120 have thesmallest PMTU and further assume that PEPS 200 and 300 utilize only thepiggyback method. PMTU discovery initiated by computer 100 to computer140 properly will discover that computer 100 can send large packets toPEP 200. PEP 200 properly will repacketize to the smaller PMTU ofInternet 120. However, PEP 300 will fail to recognize that it canrepacketize from the smaller, inbound PMTU of Internet 120 to a largerPMTU for transmission to computer 140. Only if PEP 300 uses theautonomous PMTU discovery method for data sent to computer 140 will thelarger MTU size be discovered. Alternately, PEP 300 must wait forcomputer 140 to initiate PMTU discovery to enable the larger-sizepackets, however, this only operates correctly when it is known that thetwo directions are symmetric.

It is known that the standard algorithm for PMTU discovery does not workin all configurations, due to the blocking of the returning ICMPmessages in many interior nodes, such as firewalls, etc. In thesesituations, the sender must notice that all packets are dropped afterattempting to increase the MTU. After a suitable timeout, the senderlowers the MTU and suspends the PMTU discovery algorithm. Note that theblocking of the ICMP error packet in the piggybacked PMTU mode describedabove does not cause failure of the standard PMTU discovery algorithm,as the larger packets are ACKed to the sender.

A dual-PEP algorithm performs reliable PMTU discovery between PEPS forTCP connections in a more efficient manner than that described in theIETF's RFCs. As with the standard PMTU discovery algorithm, the senderperiodically probes for a larger MTU. The sending PEP computes a newproposed PMTU size (larger than the current PMTU and no greater than theMTU of the initial network segment) and repacketizes to the larger size.Unlike the standard algorithm, fragmentation is not prohibited for theselarger packets (i.e., the DF flag is left off). The receiving PEPobserves the arrival of packets. If the receiver detects the arrival ofa fragmented packet, then the receiver reports back to the sender thatfragmentation is occurring, by marking the ACK packet that is generatedfor the received packet. There are several options for marking thepacket to indicate to the sender that fragmentation is occurring. Oneoption is to use an unused bit in the TCP header flags field. Anotheroption is to use a TCP or IP option (see e.g., FIG. 20). A third optionis to mark the IP header of the packet (i.e., IP Header Option, or someof the other underutilized fields like TOS). The receiving PEP may use asingle bit indication, requiring the sender to iteratively adjust hissending size to determine the MTU. Alternately, the receiving PEP mayuse a multi-bit field to indicate a minimum size for the MTU. This iseasily computed by the receiving PEP as the largest fragment received onthis connection. The sender can use this information to accelerate theconvergence of the iterative MTU adjustment algorithm. The receivercannot know the true value of the PMTU, the size of the fragmentsreceived only place a lower bound on the MTU.

When the sender detects the marking on a packet, it knows thatfragmentation is occurring. The proper response to a fragmentationindication depends on whether the sender actively is engaged in PMTUdiscovery. If the sender is not engaged in PMTU discovery, then thisindicates a reduction in the PMTU, causing the sender to initiate activePMTU discovery to adapt to the new smaller size. If the sender activelyis engaged in PMTU discovery, then the receipt of a fragmentationindication informs the sender that it has exceeded the PMTU, leading tothe suspension of the PMTU discovery algorithm.

The active PMTU discovery algorithm operates by increasing the MTU oftransmitted packets until a fragmentation indication is received,signaling that the PMTU has been exceeded. Because of the time lagbetween the sending of a larger packet and the reception of the ACK forit, as well as the use of cumulative ACKs, the PMTU discovery algorithmoperates with imprecise information. In a preferred embodiment, the PMTUdiscovery algorithm increases the size of packets slowly, so as toreduce the uncertainty. The PMTU for a connection is increased by a fewpercent once for every RTT that elapses without a fragmentationindication. In a preferred embodiment, the sequence number of the firstpacket with an increased RTT is recorded. If that sequence number isACKed without a fragmentation indication (either specifically orcumulatively), then the algorithm assumes that the PMTU for that packetis acceptable and increases it, again recording the sequence number.Upon receipt of a fragmentation indication, the algorithm undoes thelast increase in the PMTU and suspends itself until the next time thatPMTU discovery is initiated (either due to elapsed time or afragmentation indication). By sending all packets within an RTT at thelarger packet size, the uncertainty of cumulative ACKs is nearlyeliminated.

If the PMTU algorithm is initiated due to the unexpected receipt of afragmentation indication, then it immediately reduces the PMTU (in apreferred embodiment, by one-half of the current size, but no less thanthe minimum MTU for IP networks) before beginning to search for the newmaximum PMTU.

This algorithm is more efficient than the standard algorithm since nopackets are dropped. At worst, performance degrades due to therequirement that interior nodes perform IP fragmentation. This load isgenerally negligible, as the PMTU tends to remain unchanged for longperiods of time, allowing the period between activations of PMTUdiscovery to be large, resulting in only a slight load.

The PMTU applies to a packet flow, not to individual connections. Thisallows further optimization as the algorithm can apply its results toall connections that are part of the same flow and need be activatedonly once for the entire flow.

Optionally, a PEP can probe for a larger MTU on a connection that isinitiated to a PEP-enabled destination that does not have an establishedflow. The PEP begins data transfer with the MTU size set to the maximum’allowed for the link that it is directly connected to. If the packetexceeds the MTU of a link along the path it is fragmented, the receivingPEP informs the sending PEP that fragmentation is occurring, allowingthe sending PEP to reduce its sending size until fragmentation iseliminated.

ADDITIONAL RECONNECTION EMBODIMENT

Due to the preacking behavior of receive path 401 and send path 402,send path 431 must provide its own flow control and congestion-avoidancebehavior. One option is to utilize the standard TCP congestion with theadditive increase, multiplicative decrease behavior described by RFC2581. However, any other congestion-avoidance algorithm can be used.

Connection Establishment

TCP Connection establishment packets (SYN packets and the associatedACKs) require special handling. Firstly, SYN packets cannot always bepreacked. To preack a SYN packet, the enhanced PEP determines whetherthe TCP connection will be established. If the PEP were to preack theSYN packet and the connection could not actually be established, thenthe connection would be reset after it appeared to the applicationprogram to have opened successfully. This would likely cause failures inthe application program, as many programs are prepared to handle afailure to open a connection, but are not prepared to handle a reset ofa connection after it appeared to open successfully. Alternately, havingthe connection reset after an apparently successful open may inducerecovery behavior in the application that is inappropriate or erroneouswhen the actual problem is a failure to connect. Of course, if theenhanced PEP knows that the connection is certain to open, then it couldpreack SYN packets just like regular data packets. In the case when theenhanced PEP is not ready to guarantee successful opening of the TCPconnection, it suppresses preacking of those SYN packets. Sincepreacking is suppressed, the originating TCP endpoint remainsresponsible for retransmission in case the packet is dropped. Also, anACK-only packet that is received by a receive path (401 or 492) that isacking a SYN must not be dropped, as it would be for normal preackeddata transmissions. Instead, it is forwarded through the enhanced PEP tothe corresponding send path to complete the opening of the connection.

Secondly, the enhanced PEP alters the connection initiation optionscontained in a SYN packet. By altering the connection options, theenhanced PEP is able to utilize optional TCP capabilities that may besupported by only one of the two endpoints, gaining the benefit of theoption without requiring both endpoints to support the option. Also, theenhanced PEP may insert additional options in an attempt to probe forthe existence of other PEPs elsewhere in the connection, allowing theapplication of dual-PEP algorithms and the identification of flows. In apreferred embodiment, an enhanced PEP adds to a SYN packet a token,uniquely identifying the PEP instance. This unique token could be an IPaddress, a MAC address, a Globally Unique Identifier (GUID), a randomnumber, a machine name, an assigned number, or others. Upon receipt of aSYN packet with an identifying token a PEP can determine the flow forthe connection. Referring to FIG. 3, SYN packets transferred betweencomputer 100 and PEP 200 control the TCP conversation between them.Modified SYN packets exchanged between PEPs 200 and 300 control theconversation between them. Finally, modified SYN packets exchangedbetween PEP 300 and computer 140 control their conversation.

Referring to FIG. 4, receive path 401 receives a SYN packet, noting theconnection options contained therein. These are retained for use by sendpath 402. Receive path 401 forwards the SYN packet to send path 431 fortransmission. Send path 431 alters the connection options to includeoptional features that it supports (e.g., window scaling, selectiveacknowledgement, etc.). One or more additional TCP options can beincluded to offer dual-PEP algorithms, such as compression, CIFS serverside caching, etc. The altered packet is sent by send path 431.

Later, an answering SYN packet is received by receive path 432. Byexamining the options contained therein, receive path 432 determineswhich TCP options and PEP algorithms will be enabled for itself and sendpath 431. This answering SYN packet will, of course, be forwarded fortransmission by send path 402. However, send path 402 alters the SYNpacket's options to respond to those decoded by receive path 401.

Thus, the reader can see that two separate TCP option negotiations areperformed, resulting in two different sets of TCP options being enabled.This allows the system to obtain the benefits of these TCP optionswithout requiring the modification of all of the endpoints. For example,assume that the TCP implementation of computer 100 does not supportwindow scaling and that the TCP implementation of computer 140 doessupport window scaling. In the absence of a PEP (i.e., FIG. 1), thewindow-scaling option is not enabled, resulting in a limitation on TCPperformance when the bandwidth delay product between the two computersexceeds the maximum standard TCP window size of 65,535 bytes. However,when the enhanced PEP is present (i.e., FIG. 2), only the communicationbetween computer 100 and PEP 200 is subject to the unscaled TCPwindow-size limitation, as the communication between PEP 200 andcomputer 140 enables window scaling. Further, a differentcongestion-avoidance algorithm (more suited to long RTT links) can beemployed for the PEP 200 to computer 140 link, even if neither computer100's nor computer 140's TCP endpoint implementation supports it.

In the dual-PEP system of FIG. 3, there are three sets of TCP connectionoptions that become enabled. The first set is between computer 100 andPEP 200. The second set is between enhanced PEP 200 and PEP 300. Thethird set is between enhanced PEP 300 and computer 140. When PEP 200forwarded its connection initiating SYN packet received from computer100, it altered the TCP options to include a TCP option that allowed PEP300, upon receipt thereof, to determine that dual-PEP algorithms couldbe enabled between PEP 200 and PEP 300. PEP 300, upon forwarding theanswering SYN received from computer 140 to PEP 200, alters the TCPoptions to indicate the support of dual-PEP algorithms. Thus dual-PEPalgorithms are enabled in the PEP 200 to PEP 300 segment ofcommunication without requiring any modification of the endpoint TCPimplementations.

In a preferred embodiment, if a connection has three PEPs deployed alongit, then by utilizing the SYN-based connection information describedabove, the PEP in the middle discovers that there are PEPs on both sidesof the connection. A PEP-in-the-middle can suppress its own applicationof certain dual-PEP algorithms (for example, data compression andothers), leaving the PEPs on either end of the connection to shoulderthe burden of these algorithms, while the middle PEP merely passes thedata through itself. The PEP in the middle need not be bypassedentirely; repacketization and recongestion algorithms may still beapplied profitably, depending on the specific network topology.

Optionally, an enhanced PEP may choose not to rely solely on theendpoints to address the retransmission of connection establishmentpackets. In an alternate embodiment, an enhanced PEP retains connectionestablishment packets and periodically retransmits them until a responseis received or is no longer expected, at which point the retainedpackets can be discarded.

Some TCP options may only be specified on a connection establishmentpacket. Once one of these options is advertised for a connection, it maynot be revoked or modified for the duration of that connection. If anenhanced PEP modifies one of these options on a connection establishmentoption and subsequently discovers that there is no PEP on the other sideof the connection, it cannot revoke the modification of the options forthe duration of that connection. One example of this type of TCP optionis the RFC 1323 window scaling option. If an enhanced PEP modifies thevalue for a window scaling option (or inserts one where one did notexist before) on a connection establishment packet, then all packetsthat subsequently flow through that connection require their windowadvertisements to be scaled as specified by the window scaling actuallyin effect.

Filter Operations and Algorithms

In a preferred embodiment, filter 420 allows upper-level protocolenhancements. Any protocol based on TCP can have a filter that providesprotocol-specific optimizations. Filters are not limited to a single TCPconnection; some upper-level protocols actually consist of multiple TCPconnections as well as UDP-based protocols, all of which can be handledby filter 420.

A filter operates by reconstructing the transactions of a protocol andoptimizing them at the transaction level. Typical optimizations include:caching, pre-reading, post-writing, prediction, and others. Generally,optimizations are focused either on reducing the total amount ofbandwidth used by eliminating redundant operations or on reducinglatency in large RTT environments.

In the case of remote file access protocols, such as NFS and CIFS, thereare several optimizations that can be performed to reduce the latency ofaccesses. It is well known that most file accesses are sequential, thuswhen the filter detects that a file is being read in a sequentialmanner, it issues operations to speculatively read multiple blocks fromthe server, ahead of their having been requested.

The filter must provide a consistent view of the file data being read.As with any data-retaining proxy, several well-known rules must befollowed to ensure consistency. For example, write traffic to a filemust either invalidate or update any pre-read data for the same file.Beyond the standard rules, the filter provides additional speculativeread-ahead rules, as follows. In the CIFS case, the filter tracks theusage of opportunistic locks, allowing it to detect when the file mightbe volatile (i.e., capable of being altered by another agent), andsuppressing the read-ahead optimization in this rare case. In the NFScase, the filter is careful to ensure that any read ahead is limited toretaining its data for a short amount of time (unlike a cache, whichmight retain the data for a substantial period), typically no more thanone or two RTTs. This short duration of data retention is sufficient toensure the consistent behavior of a well-formed application, since everyread operation already views the file data at least one-half RTT out ofdate. The number of blocks read ahead is controlled by a combination ofthe available memory and bandwidth resources, as well as the RTT. Usageof the RTT in the computation of the read ahead amount optimizes use ofPEP memory, while simultaneously allowing maximum bandwidth. File systemmeta-data can be read ahead just like blocks of an individual file,accelerating many operations, such as file enumeration, file namesearching, etc.

For write-behind optimizations, many of the same issues apply. Readoperations issued after a write behind must be consistent when viewedthrough the write activity. However, write behinds represent volatiledata that must be retained even in, the face of a system failure.Nevertheless, there are many optimizations that can be performed forwrite operations, Firstly, most file servers allocate storage space onlywhen needed for a write operation. The storage allocation operation cantake substantial time and tends to be erratic in its performance. ThePEP, upon detecting a sequential write situation, forces the file serverto pre-allocate storage ahead of the actual write operation. Thisimproves performance by reducing the time needed for the server tocomplete the write operation itself. Also, by forcing a preallocation ofthe storage, the PEP is able to provide an accurate out-of-storage errorresponse to a posted write operation. Secondly, for most file types, thePEP can provide a small amount of posted-write capability, withoutimpacting correctness in the face of a system failure. Open files canhave their meta-data prefetched. By observing the pattern of access tometa-data for a file, the PEP can prefetch meta-data speculatively whena file is opened.

Beyond file-level optimizations, an enhanced PEP can also providedirectory-level optimizations. One directory-level optimization is knownas open ahead. When a PEP detects a pattern in the opening of files in adirectory, (e.g., directory enumeration, directory copy, copy all filesof type ‘x’, etc.), it can open the next file in the sequencespeculatively. The open ahead must be done with attributes that aregleaned from the original sequence, so that it is a compatible open.Some-file sharing protocols provide some form of wild-card directorysearching operation. The PEP retains the results of these operations anduses them to control the open-ahead optimization. Anotherdirectory-level optimization is meta-data prefetching. With meta-dataprefetching, the enhanced PEP prereads file meta-data speculatively inanticipation of need. Again, by retaining the data for only a shorttime, no additional consistency problems are created.

There are additional optimizations specific to the CIFS protocol, suchas file locking Current implementations of the CIFS protocol often donot recognize that multiple accesses to the same file from the samesource system do not necessarily constitute a need to demote anopportunistic lock from exclusive to shared. By tracking the usage of afile, a filter can retain an opportunistic lock, even when therequesting client has multiple opens of the file.

Another class of optimization is file open and close. Often, anapplication will open a file, close it, and reopen it almostimmediately. The filter can optimize this behavior by suppressing theclose of a file for a short time, in hopes that a subsequent open caneliminate a round trip to the file server. Even though the close issuppressed, the filter has the option to update the meta-dataimmediately, so that the information is not lost in case of a failure.If a short period elapses and the file is not reopened, then it isclosed completely.

No matter how carefully conditioned, there is always the possibilitythat a speculatively issued operation ultimately is unneeded, wastingthe associated bandwidth. The PEP limits this waste by constraining theissuance of speculative operations, based on the availability of unusedbandwidth. Speculative operations are issued only when sufficientnetwork bandwidth is available. To determine if network bandwidth isavailable, the filter examines both outgoing bandwidth (i.e., therequest) and incoming bandwidth (i.e., the response). The availabilityof bandwidth may be controlled not only by unused bandwidth on thepacket interfaces, but also by internal estimates of the availablebandwidth between two communicants, as well as any policy restrictionsthat may be present. When deployed in an interior node such as a VPNgateway, the enhanced PEP may include the bandwidth of all of theconnections transiting it in its calculations.

In a preferred embodiment, when a dual-PEP situation is detected,additional optimizations are applied to connections using the HTTPprotocol. Referring to FIG. 15, client 1500 establishes a connection toserver 1501 via upstream PEP 1510 and downstream PEP 1520. Upstream PEP1510 and downstream PEP 1520 cooperate to maintain a cache of HTTPentities. An HTTP request is constructed by client 1500 and sent toserver 1501. Upstream PEP 1510 examines the request and its cache todetermine if the response can be locally generated (i.e., is therequested entity in the cache?). If the response can be locallygenerated (i.e., the entity is present in the cache) then upstream PEP1510 generates the response and directly sends it to client 1500 (onbehalf of server 1501).

If the response cannot be locally generated (i.e., the entity is notpresent in the cache) then the request is forwarded to server 150 1 viadownstream PEP 1520. Server 1501 constructs a response and sends it toclient 1500 via downstream PEP 1520. Downstream PEP 1520 parses thereply from server 150 1, locating all references to external entities.(An external entity is an HTML entity that is not present within theresponse but is referenced through some name, such as a Uniform ResourceLocator (URL) or a Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), which is containedin the reply). Downstream PEP 1520 determines which of the externalentities are likely to be requested by client 1500. For each of thelikely to be requested entities, downstream PEP 1520 fetches them fromserver 1501 (a request is constructed and sent to server 1501,downstream PEP 1520 awaits the response—this is known as a prefetch).Downstream PEP 1520 then forwards the likely to be requested entities toupstream PEP 1510. Upstream PEP 1510 receives the likely to be requestedentities and places them in its cache in anticipation of subsequentrequests by client 1500.

The method described above requires that the downstream PEP haveknowledge about the contents of the cache of the upstream PEP. This isrelatively easy, as each of the entries in the cache of the upstream PEPhad gone through the downstream PEP at some earlier time. Manydistributed cache coherence schemes are known. In a preferredembodiment, the downstream PEP retains cache-indexing information (alsoreferred to as a cache) for the entries sent to the upstream PEP. Theupstream PEP uses a cache replacement algorithm that is predictable bythe downstream PEP so that the downstream PEP is able to maintain itscache—indexing information synchronized. to the upstream PEP as thecontents change over time without additional communication. There aretwo ways that the caches of the upstream PEP and downstream PEP willlose synchronization.

The first reason is a loss of cache information by the upstream PEP(e.g., due to a failure and restart of the upstream PEP). In thissituation, the downstream PEP will believe that the cache of theupstream PEP contains HTML entities that it does not. This situation isdetected when the downstream PEP notices that the upstream PEP hasforwarded a request for an entity that the downstream PEP believes isalready present in the cache of the upstream PEP, allowing thedownstream PEP to resynchronize its cache-index information for thisentity.

The second reason is a loss of cache information by the downstream PEP(e.g., due to a failure and restart of the downstream PEP). Thissituation results in the downstream PEP fetching and sending HTMLentities that are already present on the upstream PEP, wasting somenetwork bandwidth. The upstream PEP notices this situation (i.e., thereceipt of an entity that is already present in its cache) andresynchronizes its cache information for this entity.

HTTP requests may contain cookies. The presence of a cookie on anyparticular request is controlled by the cookie's rules. The fetching ofsome HTML entities is affected by the presence of cookies in therequest. As described above, the downstream PEP may create HTTPrequests. These requests must contain the associated cookie before theycan be processed correctly in all cases. Usually, the downstream PEP hasno problem generating the correct cookie as it has monitored previousrequests and responses from the server, allowing it to retain cookiespreviously supplied by the server. If the downstream PEP's current listof cookies is incomplete, then the response for a generated request mayalso be incorrect (since the cookie would not have been supplied withthe request). To handle this case, when the downstream PEP sends anentity to the upstream PEP's cache, it tags the response with thecookies that were used to prefetch it. Subsequently, when the upstreamPEP receives the request from the client and determines that therequested entity is present in its cache (due to a prefetch), it alsocompares the cookies present in the client's request with the cookiesthat were used by the downstream PEP to fetch the entity in determiningif the cached entry is able to satisfL the client's request. If thecookies are incompatible then the cached entry is not used and theupstream PEP forwards the client's request to the downstream PEP fornormal processing. When the downstream PEP receives this request, itnotices that the cookie associated with it is incompatible with thecookie used to perform the prefetch and updates its cookie informationaccordingly.

A mechanism must be provided that allows the upstream PEP to determineif the downstream PEP has decided to prefetch an HTML entity. Thismechanism allows the upstream PEP to determine, upon receipt of a clientrequest for that entity (for which prefetched data has not yet beenreceived), whether to forward the request to the downstream PEP (in thecase when the downstream PEP has not decided to prefetch) or to wait forthe arrival of prefetched data (in the case when the downstream PEP hasdecided to prefetch). In a preferred embodiment, the downstream PEPinserts this information into the data of the initial response. As theupstream PEP parses the initial response, it removes this information,using it determine which HTML entities the downstream PEP hasprefetched. Depending on the specific cache replace algorithm used, thisinformation may be used to maintain cache coherence between the upstreamand downstream PEPS.

The system must also deal with the transmission of the prefetched datafrom the downstream to the upstream PEP. This transmission mechanismmust be tolerant of the unreliable nature of IP networks. In a preferredembodiment, the prefetched data is inserted into the same TCP connectionas the initial response, immediately after the initial response. Theupstream PEP uses the information about each prefetched HTML entity thatwas inserted into the initial response by the downstream PEP to parsethis data out of the data stream. This technique provides (e.g.,guarantees) consistency of the data as viewed by the upstream PEP.

Packet Interfaces and Deployment Scenarios

As described above, one enhanced PEP embodiment is a stand-alone networknode. In this case, packet interface 440 and 450 would be actualhardware elements (NICs) that interface directly to a network. In oneembodiment, there are two, physically separate NIC cards, one each forpacket interfaces 440 and 450. This allows deployment “in line,” whichis shown in FIGS. 2 and 3 this is also known as bump-in-the-wire (BITW)mode. One advantage of this configuration is that the PEP need not havean IP network address and the network elements outside of the PEP neednot even be aware of its existence. Though, as stated before, it may bedesirable to provide a network address to the PEP for the purposes ofmonitoring and controlling it through the network itself. The PEP simplyprocesses all packets received at one packet interface and sends themout the other interface. Packets with unrecognized or unhandledprotocols simply are forwarded to the opposite side without furtherprocessing. Another advantage is that the PEP itself need not performany type of routing function, reducing the latency of packets transitingthe PEP.

In an alternate embodiment, packet interface 440 and 450 could be asingle hardware instance that connects to a network at a single point.This is a difficult topology, as the network must be able to routepackets into and out of the single network interface without changingthe IP addresses of the packets. In an IP networking environment, thiscan be done by use of the gateway capability of IP routing. FIG. 6depicts this configuration. Computers 600-603 (computer 600 henceforth)communicate using switch 610. Packets sent from computer 600 to computer690 are processed as follows: Computer 600 uses its routing tables tolocate the gateway for packets destined for computer 690; this gatewayhas been configured as PEP 650 (in this case PEP 650 must have an IPaddress on the local sub-net). PEP 650 receives the packet from computer600, processing it through the PEP algorithms as described above. The IPgateway for PEP 650 is set to gateway 660 and the processed packet isforwarded to it. Gateway 660 forwards the packet through network 670 tocomputer 690. Packets originating at computer 690 and destined forcomputer 600 are handled as follows: The packets arrive at gateway 660,whose routing tables direct them to PEP 650. PEP 650 processes thepackets and forwards them to computer 600. This configuration does notrequire that the PEP be on the same sub-net as the endpoint. The sameconfiguration applies equally if computer 600 is a gateway to anothernetwork. Modification of the routing tables can be performed manually orthe PEP could participate in a routing infrastructure by supporting thestandard routing protocols such as RIP, OSPF, BGP, and others.

As described above, a PEP can be deployed within an endpoint node. FIG.5 a shows a common structure for the implementation of a TCP endpoint.TCP/IP stack 500 communicates with NIC driver 520, which in turnoperates NIC 550. The application program (not shown) sends data toTCP/IP stack 500. The stack 500 creates the appropriate packets andsends them to NIC driver 520. MC driver 520 operates the hardware of NIC550, causing the packet to be sent to the network. Packets received fromthe network by NIC 550 are retrieved by NIC driver 520 and sent to stack500, for processing by the endpoint. Stack 500 delivers data to theapplication as it becomes available.

FIG. 5 b shows the deployment of a PEP within this endpoint. PEP 5 10 isinserted between NIC driver 520 and stack 500. This style of insertionis typically known as a “shim.” The connection between PEP 5 10 andstack 500 serves as one of the packet interfaces 440 or 450, and theconnection between PEP 5 10 and NIC driver 520 serves as the otherinterface. One benefit of this mechanism is that the PEP is able toleverage certain facilities already implemented in stack 500. Forexample, the address resolution protocol (ARP), used to translate IPaddresses into MAC addresses, need not be implemented in PEP 510, as theexisting implementation in stack 500 will provide the MAC address withevery packet. The PEP need only extract and utilize these addressesinstead of implementing the complete ARP.

FIG. 7 a shows diagram of a gateway. NIC drivers 710 and 720 operateNICs 750 and 760. Packets received by NIC 750, as operated by NIC driver710, are sent to gateway 700, which in turn forwards them to NIC driver720 for transmission by NIC 760, modifying them as needed. Likewise,packets received by NIC 760, as operated by NIC 720, are sent to gateway700, which in turn forwards them to NIC driver 710 for transmission byNIC 750, modifying them as needed.

FIG. 7 b shows the addition of PEP 790 to one side of the gateway. Ifthis is the LAN side of a VPN gateway, then it has access to packetsprior to any cryptographic protection added by gateway 700, allowing alarge number of PEP algorithms to be employed.

An alternate deployment mode, called proxy mode, is depicted in FIG. 12.In this mode, upstream PEP 1200 hosts an IP address (called a VIP) thatis a virtual analog of server computer 1220. Computer 100 (or any of100-1 03) connect to server computer 1220 using either the VIP or thestandard address for server computer 1220. When connection is to theVIP, the packets are automatically routed to upstream PEP 1200 bystandard IP networking techniques. Upon receipt of packets to the VIPaddress, upstream PEP 1200 relabels these packets as sourced Eromupstream PEP 1200 (or optionally, sourced fiom the VIP) and destined fordownstream PEP 1210. When downstream PEP 1210 receives these packets,they are relabeled to be sourced from downstream PEP 1210 and destinedfor server computer 1220. Server computer 1220 understands that thisconnection originates from downstream PEP 1210. Consequently, whenpackets for this connection are sent from server computer 1220 they aredestined for downstream PEP 1210. Upon receipt of these packets,downstream PEP 1210 relabels these packets to be sourced from downstreamPEP 1210 and destined for upstream PEP 1200. Upstream PEP 1200 receivesthese packets and relabels them to be sourced from VIP and destined forcomputer 100.

As with standard TCP, port number pairs are used to distinguish betweenindividual conversations between two IP addresses. Port numbers for theconnection are selected as follows. When upstream PEP 1200 receives aconnection establishment packet from computer 100, it allocates a newport number for use in communication with downstream PEP 1210. Asdescribed above, the connection establishment packet is labeled asdestined for downstream PEP 1210 and sourced from upstream PEP 1200using the newly allocated port number (the downstream PEP uses a fixed,well known, port number). Further, upstream PEP 1200 inserts into theconnection establishment packet information to inform downstream PEP1210 of the ultimate destination for this connection, i.e., servercomputer 1220. This information consists of a TCP option that allowsdownstream PEP 1210 to determine the IP address and destination port forserver computer 1220. In a preferred embodiment, the TCP option containsthe IP address and port number for server computer 1220. In an alternateembodiment, the IP address is replaced with an index into a table ofknown server computers. Optionally, upstream PEP 1200 may also insertthe IP address and port number of the connection from computer 100 forinformational purposes, otherwise downstream PEP 1210 has no knowledgeof the initiator of the connection. When downstream PEP 1210 receivesthe connection establishment packet, it uses the connection informationplaced into the TCP option by upstream PEP 1200 to determine the finaldestination of the connection (IP address and port number for servercomputer 1220). Downstream PEP 1210 then allocates a new port number forthis connection and relabels the connection establishment packet andforwards it to server computer 1220. (Note that these modifications tothe connection establishment packet are optionally in addition to anyother modifications of the packet for the purposes of supporting otherPEP algorithms).

In this mode, no changes to the network routing and switchinginfrastructure are required. Only connections to the new VIP address aremodified. This allows a fine-grained control over which connections aremodified and which are not, simply by altering the naming infrastructureused by the application that is establishing the connection.

The upstream and downstream PEPS may have multiple network connectionswith multiple IP addresses. FIG. 13 shows one possible network topologywith multiple connections for the downstream proxy. In this topology,downstream PEP 1210 has two network connections. One of the networkconnections is devoted to intercommunicating with upstream PEP 1200 andone of the connections is devoted to intercommunicating with servercomputer 1220. In this configuration, the IP address of server computer1220 may or may not be directly visible to computer 100 (the figure doesnot show a direct connection as its present or absence has no effect onthe operation of this mode).

One deficiency with this mode is that each PEP requires knowledge of theIF and VIP addresses that are related prior to establishing theconnection. In a preferred embodiment, these relationships are enteredmanually into each PEP. In an alternate embodiment, the relationshipsare stored in a central facility that is consulted by each PEP.

Another deficiency of this deployment mode is that computer 100 andserver computer 1220 address do not use the same IP addresses tointercommunicate. This creates problems with protocols that send IPaddresses (and port numbers) as payloads within other IP packets. Forthese protocols, the upstream and downstream PEP monitor the payloads ofpackets using these protocols and edit their contents to properlyreflect the correct IP address/port combinations. This is similar to thesame process that a network address translation device (NAT) mustperform when amalgamating multiple local IP addresses into a singleexternal IP address.

Some protocols require that server computer 1220 initiate a connectionto computer 100. In this situation, the entire mechanism as describedabove operates in reverse; upstream PEP 1200 plays the role of thedownstream PEP 12 10 and vice-versa. As described above, enabling thiscapability requires that upstream PEP 1200 and downstream PEP 121 0 havethe necessary IP address and port number associations. As describedabove, these relationships could be established manually or byconsulting a central facility. For some protocols, the reverse proxyinformation can be determined automatically by monitoring the payloadsfor normal connections. For example, in the FTP protocol, a PORT commandis issued by the client to the server to direct ‘the server to contactthe client for a specific transfer. The PORT command contains the IPaddress and port number for the server to contact the client at. In apreferred embodiment, upstream PEP 1200 and downstream PEP 1210 monitorthe payloads of FTP connections and altering any PORT commands andinternal tables to allow the subsequent connection to be successfullyinitiated by server computer 1220 to computer 100.

Hybrid deployment modes are also supported. FIG. 14 depicts thearchitecture of the half-proxy mode. In this mode, the upstream PEP 1400operates in “bump-in-the-wire” mode as described above. The downstreamPEP 14 10 operates as a combination of the upstream PEP 1200 anddownstream PEP 12 1 0 of proxy mode. In half-proxy mode, the downstreamPEP 14 1 0 hosts the VIP that is a virtual analog for server computer1420. It relabels packets that are destined for the VIP as being sourcedfrom the VIP and destined for server computer 1420. Port numbers, areallocated as needed.

Cryptographic NICs

A new class of NIC has been developed recently, the crypto-NIC. Thecrypto-NIC provides acceleration for the encryption and authenticationof data packets for standard protocols, such as IPSec. Deployment ofthese cards has caused architectural changes in the operating systeminterface between protocol stacks, such as TCPAP and NIC drivers. Modernoperating system driver interfaces allow the protocol stack tointerrogate the NIC driver to detect the ’\presence of support for oneor more of the cryptographic protocols. A crypto-NIC responds with alist the cryptographic algorithms that are supported, causing theprotocol stack to direct the NIC to apply its cryptographic algorithmsto packets as they are processed. Most crypto-NICs only provide bulkpacket processing and do not provide any of the key distributionprocessing, leaving the protocol stack to perform this operation. Theprotocol stack provides the crypto-NIC with the cryptographic keys thathave been allotted or negotiated by the key processing, allowing thecrypto-NIC to apply properly the cryptographic algorithms for bothsending and receiving packets. In this case, the communications betweenthe protocol stack and the crypto-NIC are clear-text packets.

This situation creates an opportunity for the shim implementation of anenhanced PEP, whether a crypto-NIC is present or not. In the shimimplementation of a PEP, the upper-level packet interface exports to theprotocol stack the same software interface as a NIC. In a preferredembodiment, the shim responds to the protocol stack as though it were acrypto-NIC, returning a list of all implemented cryptographiccapabilities when asked to do so. Hence, the protocol stack will assumethat the PEP is a crypto-NIC and will provide it with cryptographickeys, expecting it to perform cryptographic operations on the packets.Thus, the PEP is able to operate on clear-text packets even in thepresence of strong cryptographic protections. If there is no crypto-NICpresent in the system or if the existing crypto-NIC does not support aparticular cryptographic algorithm, then the PEP must provide thealgorithms that it has indicated support for. However, if a crypto-NICthat supports the selected algorithms is present in the system, then thePEP uses it through the NIC driver, just as if it was the protocol stackitself.

When deployed in a shim configuration within an endpoint whose operatingsystem supports crypto-NICs, the PEP is able to operate on clear-textpackets, providing all PEP algorithms. Further, in this situation, nomodification to the security policies is required. Communicationsleaving the endpoint remain at the same level of security as without thePEP.

When the present invention is used on the WAN side of a VPN as a shim,it utilizes the crypto-NIC operating system interface to gain access tothe packets, independent of the presence of a crypto-NIC. In particular,it has access to the clear text of each packet and can perform all PEPoperations normally prohibited when presented with the cipher-textversion, which would be required if connected outside of the endpoint.

PEP NAT

PEP algorithms are not limited to optimizing connections. A PEP can alsoprovide network address translation (NAT) as documented in RFC 1631. Ina preferred embodiment, a PEP can create a “shadow” IP address,importing the presence of a system with an IP address on one side of thePEP onto the other side of the PEP. For example, referring to FIG. 2,assume that computers 100-103 are all on a common sub-net and that thePEP 200 has been configured to import computer 141 onto that sub-net. Ashadow IP address from the sub-net of computers 100-103 is assigned tothe import and configured into PEP 200. PEP 200 responds to addressresolution protocol (ARP) requests and identifies its packet interfaceas the home for the shadow IP address, causing packets for that IPaddress to be sent to PEP 200 (no modification of the gateway address orrouting tables is required in this case). Upon receiving packetsdestined for the shadow IP address, PEP 200 edits the packets using thetechniques in RFC 1631, directing them to computer 141. Edited packetsare processed through the PEP like other packets and are forwarded togateway 110. Returning packets are processed similarly.

Flows

In a preferred embodiment, the PEP assigns TCP connections to flows. Ifthe SYN packet exchange identifies a PEP on the other side of theconnection, then the TCP connection is assigned to a flow for that PEP.In the case where there are multiple PEPS along a route, the last PEP isused as the end of the flow.

The PMTU of a flow is used by the repacketization algorithm for allconnections assigned to that flow. Further, PMTU discovery need beperformed only on one of the connections within a flow. When a newconnection is established that has been assigned to a preexisting flow,the recongestion algorithm can use the flow information to providesubstantially faster initial throughput than the standard TCP slow startalgorithm. The flow can retain bandwidth and RTT information, allowingrecongestion and bandwidth allocation algorithms to operate across theconnections within the flow. Furthermore, when x-duplex detection isperformed for a connection, the same assumptions can be applied to allof the connections applied to the same flow. Also, by collectingx-duplex information across all of the flows, the probabilistic x-duplexalgorithms will reduce false error rates.

SUMMARY

The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has beenpresented for the purpose of illustration; it is not intended to beexhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed.Persons skilled in the relevant art can appreciate that manymodifications and variations are possible in light of the aboveteachings. It is therefore intended that the scope of the invention belimited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claimsappended hereto.

We claim:

1. A method for communicating with a remote system using Internet Protocol (IP) via a computer network, the method comprising: transmitting, by a flow control module configured on a device, a data packet from a sender to a remote system, the transmitted data packet including a transport layer sequence number and a first internet layer internet protocol identifier (IP ID) field, the first IP ID field comprising a first unique value; retransmitting, by the flow control module, the data packet to the remote system, the retransmitted data packet including the transport layer sequence number and a second IP ID field, the second IP ID field comprising a second unique value different than the first unique value; receiving, by the flow control module, an acknowledgment packet sent by the remote system, the acknowledgement packet including the transport layer sequence number and a transport control protocol (TCP) timestamp echo reply field, the TCP timestamp echo reply field comprising one of the first unique value or the second unique value; and determining, by the flow control module, whether the received acknowledgment packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the transmission of the data packet or the retransmission of the data packet, via the value of the TCP timestamp echo reply field.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first unique value and second unique value comprise timestamps.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the first unique value and second unique value comprise unique counter values.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first unique value and second unique value are sequential.
 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising: transmitting, by the flow control module, one or more additional data packets from the sender to the remote system prior to retransmitting the data packet; and presuming lost, by the flow control module, the one or more additional data packets sent prior to retransmitting the data packet, responsive to: (i) determining that the received acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the retransmission of the data packet, and (ii) receipt of the one or more additional data packets not being acknowledged by the remote system.
 6. A method for communicating with a remote system using Internet Protocol (IP) via a computer network, the method comprising: transmitting, by a flow control module configured on a device, a first data packet from a sender to a remote system, the transmitted first data packet including a first transport layer sequence number; transmitting, by the flow control module, a second data packet from the sender to the remote system, the second data packet including a second transport layer sequence number; transmitting, by the flow control module, a third data packet from the sender to the remote system, the third data packet including a third transport layer sequence number; retransmitting, by the flow control module, the first data packet from the sender to the remote system, the retransmitted first data packet including the first sequence number; maintaining, by the flow control module, an ordered list of sequence numbers in order of transmission, the list comprising an entry for each of the transmission of the first, second, and third data packets and the retransmission of the first data packet; receiving, by the flow control module from the remote system, a first acknowledgement packet, the first acknowledgement packet including one of: (i) the second sequence number to indicate receipt by the remote system of the second data packet, or (ii) the third sequence number to indicate receipt by the remote system of the third data packet; receiving, by the flow control module from the remote system, a second acknowledgement packet, the second acknowledgement packet including the first sequence number; and determining, by the flow control module, whether the received second acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of one of: (i) the transmission of the first data packet, responsive to the entry for the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet being closer in the ordered list to the entry for the transmission of the first data packet, or (ii) the retransmission of the first data packet, responsive to the entry for the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet being closer in the ordered list to the entry for the retransmission of the first data packet.
 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising adding, by the flow control module, an entry to the ordered list responsive to transmission or retransmission of a data packet, the entry comprising the transport layer sequence number of the transmission or retransmission of the data packet.
 8. The method of claim 6, further comprising identifying as a last known received entry, by the flow control module and responsive to receiving the first acknowledgement packet, an entry in the ordered list corresponding to the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet.
 9. The method of claim 6, further comprising: transmitting, by the flow control module, one or more additional data packets from the sender to the remote system prior to retransmitting the first data packet; and presuming lost, by the flow control module, the one or more additional data packets sent prior to retransmitting the first data packet, responsive to: (i) determining that the received acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the retransmission of the first data packet, and (ii) receipt of the one or more additional data packets not being acknowledged by the remote system.
 10. The method of claim 6, wherein the ordered list further comprises a timestamp corresponding to each entry.
 11. The method of claim 6, wherein the second acknowledgement packet does not include an explicit identifier indicating the number of times a data packet was retransmitted.
 12. The method of claim 6, further comprising: re-retransmitting, by the flow control module, the first data packet from the sender to the remote system, the re-retransmitted first data packet including the first sequence number; adding, by the flow control module, an entry to the ordered list responsive to re-retransmitting the first data packet, the entry comprising the first sequence number; and determining, by the flow control module, that the received second acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of one of: (i) the transmission of the first data packet, responsive to the entry for the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet being closer in the ordered list to the entry for the transmission of the first data packet, (ii) the retransmission of the first data packet, responsive to the entry for the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet being closer in the ordered list to the entry for the retransmission of the first data packet, or (iii) the re-retransmission of the first data packet, responsive to the entry for the sequence number included in the first acknowledgement packet being closer in the ordered list to the entry for the re-retransmission of the first data packet.
 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising: transmitting, by the flow control module, one or more additional data packets from the sender to the remote system prior to re-retransmitting the first data packet; and presuming lost, by the flow control module, the one or more additional data packets sent prior to re-retransmitting the first data packet, responsive to: (i) determining that the received acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the re-retransmission of the first data packet, and (ii) receipt of the one or more additional data packets not being acknowledged by the remote system.
 14. A system for communicating with a remote system using Internet Protocol (IP) via a computer network, the system comprising: a device deployed between a sender and a remote system, the device comprising a flow control module, the flow control configured to: transmit a data packet from a sender to a remote system, the transmitted data packet including a transport layer sequence number and a first internet layer internet protocol identifier (IP ID) field, the first IP ID field comprising a first unique value; retransmit the data packet to the remote system, the retransmitted data packet including the transport layer sequence number and a second IP ID field, the second IP ID field comprising a second unique value different than the first unique value; receive an acknowledgment packet sent by the remote system, the acknowledgement packet including the transport layer sequence number and a transport control protocol (TCP) timestamp echo reply field, the TCP timestamp echo reply field comprising one of the first unique value or the second unique value; and determine whether the received acknowledgment packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the transmission of the data packet or the retransmission of the data packet, via the value of the TCP timestamp echo reply field.
 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the first unique value and second unique value comprise timestamps.
 16. The system of claim 14, wherein the first unique value and second unique value comprise unique counter values.
 17. The system of claim 14, wherein the first unique value and second unique value are sequential.
 18. The system of claim 14, wherein the flow control module is further configured to: transmit one or more additional data packets from the sender to the remote system prior to retransmitting the data packet; and presume lost the one or more additional data packets sent prior to retransmitting the data packet, responsive to: (i) determining that the received acknowledgement packet acknowledges receipt by the remote system of the retransmission of the data packet, and (ii) receipt of the one or more additional data packets not being acknowledged by the remote system.
 19. The system of claim 14, wherein the flow control module communicates with a second flow control module on the remote system.
 20. The system of claim 12, wherein the device comprises one of a server, a client or an intermediary network device. 